Market-top monitor — is anything warning us?

Research · updated monthly · 2026-09-14

Is anything warning of a market top?

Every warning signal we hold, scored one way: when this signal was at its most extreme readings, how often did the S&P 500 fall 10%, 15% or 20% within the next 3, 6 or 12 months, compared with how often that happens anyway. Then the part that matters if you would act on it: how early the warning came, how much higher the market went first, and whether a short opened on the warning day ever got 15% into the money.

Where are we now, and would these warnings have made money?

Pick a reading and a rule. Green grows $100 by following the rule; grey is $100 simply held in the S&P 500 over the same months. Along the bottom, red marks months the reading was in its top zone and green months in its bottom zone. Pink bands are stressed markets.

Reading (click to chart)LatestWhere it sitsTop readings: S&P fell 10%+ within a yearBottom readings: S&P up 10%+ a year laterStay invested, avoid topsShort tops, buy bottoms
How to read it. "Where it sits" is the latest reading as a percentile of all earlier months: 80 or higher is the top zone (the most top-like 20% seen so far), 20 or lower the bottom zone. Thresholds only ever use earlier months, so nothing is fitted to what happened next. Returns are monthly, after 5 basis points per trade, 0.5% a year to borrow for shorts, and T-bill interest on cash. Trading records start in 2009 at the earliest, because each reading needs three years of history before its zones mean anything, so the 2008 crash is not in them. Most of 2009–2026 was a rising market, which is why shorting at top readings mostly lost money. The two percentages compare what followed top or bottom readings with what followed any month (in brackets). Seven 15% falls since 2006 is a small sample; treat every number here as history, not a forecast.
Read this first. Since 2006 there have been 7 falls of 15% or more. That is not enough to prove a rule, and we do not fit one. "Extreme readings" means the most dangerous 20% of months for that signal. The combined reading is a plain count of how many signals are extreme at once, with each signal's line drawn using only earlier data. In any 12-month window the S&P falls 10% or more 56% of the time and 15% or more 40% of the time; that is the bar every signal has to beat.

Re-run 2026-09-14 without survivorship bias: the stock-market readings now include every stock in each year's 1,500 most traded, including companies that were later delisted, instead of only today's survivors.

Today

0 of 6signals at extreme readings (month-end 2026-08-31)
None.
0%chance of a 15% fall within 12 months, in past months with this count
Any month: 40%. A 10% fall: 24% (any month 56%).
of the 20 past months that looked most like today were followed by a 15% fall
Caution: when this look-alike method said 60% or more in the past, a fall actually followed 31% of the time. Use it as context, not a forecast.
3.1%S&P 500 below its 1-year high (live, 2026-09-16)
Market state: Calm. A top is when this number is near zero.

Bars: how many signals were extreme at each month-end. Line: the S&P 500's distance below its 1-year high. Shaded: the year before each 15% fall and the fall itself. The question the picture answers: do tall bars sit in the shaded stretches, or everywhere?

The combined reading

Count how many of the 10 core signals are at extreme readings. Then look at what followed months with that count.

Signals extreme at onceMonths10% fall within 6 mo10% fall within 12 mo15% fall within 12 mo20% fall within 12 moS&P lower a year laterAvg return, next 12 mo
Any month (the bar to beat)23633%56%40%17%17%12.3%
0 ◀ today2119%24%0%0%0%18.5%
13727%59%30%3%5%17.5%
24432%45%39%16%7%17.3%
34326%42%28%16%7%17.8%
4 or more5542%80%56%15%18%10.2%

Red = at least 15 points above the bar; green = at least 15 points below it. Straight answer: no count, and no single signal below, reliably predicted a 15% fall. The most extreme readings roughly double the odds over a bar that is already high, and they arrive early.

What happened at each of the 7 falls

FallPeakDepthWarned (3+ extreme)?First warningSignals thenMonths before the peakMonths before −15%Market rose further byFell 15% below the warning-day price?
2008-012007-10-09-51.5%not scorable (needs 3 years of history first)
2009-082009-08-03-22.4%no (at most 1 extreme)
2011-082011-04-29-18.6%yes2009-12-31S&P 12-month return, M2 money growth, year over year, Share of stocks within 5% of their own high, Sahm rule: unemployment vs its 12-mo low15.919.2+25.4%no
2018-122018-09-20-19.3%yes2017-01-31Shiller CAPE, Credit spread (tight = complacent), VIX (complacency = low)19.722.7+32.7%no
2020-032020-02-19-33.7%yes2019-11-30Shiller CAPE, Yield curve 10y−3m (inverted = negative), VIX (complacency = low)2.63.2+8.2%yes
2022-052022-01-03-24.5%yes2020-06-30Shiller CAPE, Yield curve 10y−3m (inverted = negative), Sahm rule: unemployment vs its 12-mo low18.122.3+58.3%no
2025-042025-02-19-18.8%yes2023-06-30Credit spread (tight = complacent), Yield curve 10y−3m (inverted = negative), M2 money growth, year over year19.521+41.1%no

Each signal on its own

For each signal: in the months when it was at its most extreme 20% of readings, how often a fall followed, next to how often one follows any month. "Nothing happened" is the false-alarm rate: the share of extreme months with no 10% fall in the next 6 months.

SignalSince10% fall within 6 mo ?15% fall within 12 mo20% fall within 12 moNothing happened (6 mo)Falls warnedWarning came (months before −15%)Market rose furtherShort got 15% in the moneyToday
FINRA short-volume share (2021→ only)
FINRA
2021-09 80% vs 33% 80% vs 40% 50% vs 17% 20% 2 of 77.2+11.7%2 of 2normal
Oil price, 6-month change
FRED WTI
2006-01 42% vs 33% 69% vs 40% 29% vs 17% 58% 6 of 78.3+11%2 of 6normal
Shiller CAPE
Shiller
2006-01 46% vs 33% 65% vs 40% 21% vs 17% 54% 3 of 715+30.6%0 of 3
Median owner-earnings IRR of our universe (rich = low)
SAVNG point-in-time table — SEC filings + FirstRate prices incl. later-delisted companies
2012-02 39% vs 33% 64% vs 40% 24% vs 17% 61% 2 of 712.3+15.6%0 of 2
Insider buy/sell ratio (3-mo, all companies)
SAVNG Form 4 corpus
2006-01 40% vs 33% 60% vs 40% 35% vs 17% 60% 3 of 716.2+26.6%2 of 3
Sahm rule: unemployment vs its 12-mo low
FRED UNRATE
2006-01 46% vs 33% 60% vs 40% 24% vs 17% 54% 4 of 723.3+17.4%2 of 4normal
Credit spread (tight = complacent)
FRED / Baa proxy
2006-01 28% vs 33% 58% vs 40% 10% vs 17% 72% 4 of 715+26.6%2 of 4
S&P 12-month return
FirstRate SPY
2006-01 44% vs 33% 58% vs 40% 17% vs 17% 56% 6 of 714.4+27.3%2 of 6normal
CPI rent, year over year
FRED CUSR0000SEHA
2006-01 33% vs 33% 54% vs 40% 10% vs 17% 67% 2 of 736+41.4%2 of 2normal
Insider buying vs its own 3-yr norm
SAVNG Form 4 corpus
2006-01 33% vs 33% 48% vs 40% 0% vs 17% 67% 4 of 714.7+22.2%0 of 4
Share of stocks above their 200-day average
FirstRate top-1,500 incl. later-delisted stocks
2006-01 21% vs 33% 48% vs 40% 4% vs 17% 79% 6 of 711.6+10.3%2 of 6normal
M2 money growth, year over year
FRED M2SL
2006-01 31% vs 33% 48% vs 40% 0% vs 17% 69% 2 of 730+77.3%0 of 2normal
M2 growth, change over 6 months
FRED M2SL
2006-01 33% vs 33% 48% vs 40% 15% vs 17% 67% 4 of 712.3+15.6%1 of 4normal
Initial jobless claims, year over year
FRED ICSA
2006-01 33% vs 33% 46% vs 40% 29% vs 17% 67% 6 of 714.7+16.7%3 of 6normal
Yield curve 10y−3m (inverted = negative)
FRED T10Y3M
2006-01 19% vs 33% 42% vs 40% 15% vs 17% 81% 3 of 717.6+25.2%2 of 3normal
Share of stocks within 5% of their own high
FirstRate top-1,500 incl. later-delisted stocks
2006-01 31% vs 33% 38% vs 40% 2% vs 17% 69% 6 of 79.2+15.6%2 of 6normal
Yield curve 10y−2y
FRED
2006-01 17% vs 33% 35% vs 40% 6% vs 17% 83% 3 of 723.6+26.6%3 of 3
Share of stocks 20%+ below their high
FirstRate top-1,500 incl. later-delisted stocks
2006-01 25% vs 33% 35% vs 40% 2% vs 17% 75% 4 of 714.4+18.5%1 of 4normal
Dollar index, 6-month change
FRED DTWEXBGS
2006-06 53% vs 33% 32% vs 40% 13% vs 17% 47% 5 of 79.1+5.2%3 of 5normal
Case-Shiller house prices, year over year
FRED CSUSHPINSA
2006-01 27% vs 33% 31% vs 40% 21% vs 17% 73% 1 of 717.2+34.3%0 of 1normal
10-year Treasury yield, change over 6 months
FRED DGS10
2006-01 21% vs 33% 29% vs 40% 4% vs 17% 79% 5 of 79.1+9.2%1 of 5extreme
VIX (complacency = low)
CBOE
2006-01 25% vs 33% 23% vs 40% 6% vs 17% 75% 4 of 77.7+12.1%3 of 4

Monthly, 2006-01-31 → 2026-08-31 (248 months). Insider data through 2026-06. Macro series from FRED with publication lags applied, so nothing is used before it was public. "Falls" are measured from the running high after each month-end. Educational; not a forecast and not advice.

Screen Lab → · All research →