Odysight.ai Inc. (ODYS) Stock Analysis

Price updated yesterday · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

Odysight.ai Inc.

ODYS Technology IT Services📄 SEC filings ↗
Speculative
▾ What's in the 27/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100 · Altman Z not scored — input unavailable (see Financial Health)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 31/100 → +9.7
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 33/100 → +8.5
Total27/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). It excludes the Altman Z score, whose retained-earnings input this filer does not report separately. See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $3.31 · yesterday 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read ODYS (speculative micro-cap)

No model can pin a precise fair value on a company this small — but that does not mean there is nothing to learn. The useful questions are what the price is betting on, and whether the company can survive long enough to deliver it.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reverse-DCF — what growth the price assumes ↓
    The single most useful number here: it backs out the growth the market is paying for. If that figure is "historically unprecedented," the price is running on hype, not fundamentals.
  2. 2 Cash runway ↓
    A pre-profit micro-cap lives or dies on whether it can fund itself to profitability before running out of money and diluting you.
  3. 3 The raw financial statements + the 10-K ↓
    At this scale, the actual numbers, insider ownership, and share-count trend tell you more than any ratio.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ Using the right valuation lens for this business type

Standard DCF doesn't fit ODYS well — but that's expected for this kind of business. The Rule of 40 (Pre-Profit Growth) Lens below uses the metrics actually used by analysts who value it services. Reverse DCF + Football Field also work as cross-checks.

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

How to read a company this small

ODYS is too small and/or too volatile for the valuation lenses we use on larger, more stable companies. The numbers shown below should be taken as rough orientation only.

✅ What actually drives value for this kind of company
  • Latest annual revenue $3.0M — too small for meaningful growth percentages
❌ Metrics that DON'T apply (ignore these even if you see them below)

Growth percentages on tiny revenue bases (1000% going from $200K to $2M is not predictive). P/E and ROE swing wildly with small earnings changes. Peer comparisons fail because there often aren't comparable companies at this scale.

📚 Where to actually look

Start with the Reverse-DCF above — it backs out the growth the price is betting on; if that figure is "historically unprecedented," the price is running on hype, not fundamentals. Then the cash runway (can it fund itself to profitability before diluting you?). Then the raw Financials table and the 10-K on SEC EDGAR — at this scale, insider ownership and the share-count trend often matter more than any ratio.

Classified as Speculative Nano / Micro-cap (confidence 80%). Disagree? An admin can override via the post edit screen.

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
3 / 9
Weak
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income -$17.0M in FY2025.
    Why this matters: Does the company actually earn a profit? Sustained losses eventually force it to raise money — diluting you — or take on debt.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow -$13.7M (was -$8.2M the prior year).
    Why this matters: Profit can be an accounting figure; cash from running the business is harder to fake. Negative operating cash flow means the core business consumes cash and must be funded externally.
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow -$13.7M vs net income -$17.0M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets -58.8% vs -49.7% a year ago.
    Why this matters: Is the company squeezing more profit out of each dollar of assets than last year? Rising = getting more efficient; falling = the opposite.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    The filing reports no interest-bearing debt in either year (total assets $29.0M).
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 9.17x vs 6.31x a year ago.
  • Share count (dilution)
    Share count rose 38.9% (0.0M → 0.0M year-over-year).
    Why this matters: Issuing lots of new shares splits the pie into more pieces, shrinking your slice. Stable or falling share count protects existing owners.
  • Pricing power (gross margin)
    Gross margin 28.9% vs 29.2% a year ago.
    Why this matters: Rising gross margin means stronger pricing power or lower input costs — a sign of competitive strength. Falling margin signals pressure.
  • Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 0.10x vs 0.17x a year ago.
    Why this matters: Asset turnover measures how much revenue each dollar of assets generates. Rising = more productive use of the asset base.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

Cash Runway
22 mo
MODERATE — 1-2 years of runway

Plain English: the company holds about $26M in cash and is burning roughly $14M/year in operations. At that pace, the cash lasts 22 mo before it must raise capital (diluting shareholders), take on debt, or cut spending.

Assumes constant burn and ignores financing/asset sales. For pre-profit biotech and growth companies, this matters more than a DCF — a great drug pipeline is worthless if they run out of money before approval.

Price$3.31
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Odysight.ai Inc. due to its negative operating cash flow and net income, indicating a cash-burning growth stage. Investors are likely betting on the company's ability to scale its revenue, which has grown 67.1% annually over four years, and eventually achieve profitability. The primary quantifiable risk is the continued negative operating cash flow, which could necessitate further capital raises.

⚠️ Revenue declining

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
Revenue must continue its rapid growth trajectory and gross margin must expand further from 28.9% to achieve scale and move towards profitability.
🐻 The Bear Case
Continued negative operating cash flow, if sustained, will deplete cash reserves and necessitate dilutive equity raises, hindering long-term shareholder value.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Acceleration or deceleration of revenue growth
  • Improvement in gross margin percentage
  • Progress towards positive operating cash flow

The trend, in plain numbers (FY2024 → FY2025, latest reported)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

⚠ Worsening
  • Revenue fell -24% to $3.0M.
  • Free cash flow is negative at -$16.8M — the cash burn widened vs last year.
  • Still unprofitable at -$17.0M — loss widening.

Nothing was clearly improving year-over-year.

Roughly flat: Gross margin held to 29% (0 pts).

Management & Leadership

Odysight.ai Inc. is led by CEO and Chairman Yoav Zurel, who has been instrumental in guiding the company's strategic direction. The executive team focuses on developing and deploying advanced AI-powered vision solutions.

Yoav Zurel
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

What They Make

Odysight.ai Inc. develops and sells AI-powered computer vision solutions primarily for defense, security, and industrial applications, providing enhanced situational awareness and operational efficiency to its customers.

End Markets

DefenseSecurityIndustrial

Revenue Drivers

AI vision system sales
Software licenses
Integration services
Beta: 0.60

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Enhanced situational awareness
Improved operational efficiency
Advanced threat detection
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer This company's reported free cash flow is negative, so a discounted-cash-flow valuation has no positive cash stream to discount. That is a fact about the business, not missing data — the reported figures below are complete.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market is pricing Odysight.ai based on its high revenue growth of 67.1% per year, indicating expectations for future scale and market penetration, rather than current profitability. The market may be assigning value to the potential for its AI vision technology to gain wider adoption in critical sectors, which is not in the model, despite negative net income and operating cash flow.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Sales of AI-powered vision systems
Software licensing and subscriptions
Professional services for integration and support

The company funds itself primarily through equity raises, given its negative operating cash flow, and does not currently pay dividends or engage in buybacks.

Growth / Revenue DCF

Negative free cash flow: revenue/margin growth model used - standard FCF DCF is unreliable for companies still scaling.

Show advanced inputs
Revenue Growth50.0%

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project product, services and recurring/cloud lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Growth / re-investment phase

Moat Signals

Proprietary AI algorithms
Specialized industry applications
Integration with existing security infrastructure

Revenue has been growing at 67.1% per year over four years, from $0M to $3M, while net income has been negative in the latest period.

Geography & Markets

Odysight.ai Inc. is headquartered in the US, with its technology likely deployed in various international markets given the nature of defense and security solutions, though specific geographic revenue splits are not available.

Geographic Risks

Customer concentration risk within defense/security sectors
Technological obsolescence or competitive pressures

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape neutral - aligned.
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
41.8NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BullishLine above signalThe fast trend is above the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently upward.
50-Day Average$5.57Price below (-40.6%)Price below its 50-day average = near-term downtrend.
200-Day Average$4.52Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossGolden50-day above 200-dayA "golden cross" — the medium trend has overtaken the long trend (often read as bullish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (5 notes — click to expand/collapse)

HIGH Revenue declining
Guardrail Notes (4)
  • FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.
  • Illiquidity discount 15% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Extreme valuation (P/IV withheld — see the note above); output dominated by data/units issue (often a multi-class share-count mismatch). Suppressed.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Odysight.ai Inc.'s SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
20253.0M-17.0M$-1.07
20244.0M-11.8M$-1.03
20233.0M-9.4M$-0.98
2022665,000-9.5M$-1.33
2021387,000-9.0M$-1.44

Cash Flow (5yr)

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
2025 -13.7M 56,000 3.1M -16.8M
2024 -8.2M 53,000 2.4M -10.7M
2023 -10.0M 113,000 1.7M -11.8M
2022 -6.1M 118,000 1.6M -7.9M
2021 -5.9M 595,000 2.0M -8.5M

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: -13.7M − 56,000 − 3.1M (SBC & adj.) = -16.8M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a projected from revenue × terminal margin, not this single year.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets29.0M
Total Liabilities3.6M
Equity25.4M
PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $ODYS — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $ODYS on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.