Sangoma Technologies Corp (SANG) Stock Analysis

Price updated 2 days ago · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

Sangoma Technologies Corp

SANG Technology Software & IT Services📄 SEC filings ↗ CUSIP 80100R408
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 42/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 65/100 → +20.4
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 50/100 → +12.9
Total42/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $3.61 · 2 days ago 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read SANG (pre-profit growth)

This company is reinvesting instead of generating profit, so a standard DCF cannot price it. The useful question is whether the growth the market is paying for is achievable — and whether the company can fund itself until then.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reverse-DCF — the growth the price demands ↓
    It shows exactly how fast the business must grow to justify today's price. Compare that to what comparable companies have actually achieved.
  2. 2 Cash runway ↓
    Can it reach profitability before it has to raise money and dilute shareholders?
  3. 3 Interactive calculator ↓
    Set your own growth + margin assumptions and see what the business would be worth if you are right.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ Using the right valuation lens for this business type

Standard DCF doesn't fit SANG well — but that's expected for this kind of business. The Rule of 40 (Pre-Profit Growth) Lens below uses the metrics actually used by analysts who value software & it services. Reverse DCF + Football Field also work as cross-checks.

ⓘ Why does SANG trade at $3.61?

Sangoma Technologies Corp has 33.3 million shares outstanding. At $3.61 per share, the market values all outstanding SANG equity at $120 million. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash (SANG carries little or no debt, so the two are close here). The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values SANG in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

How does SANG stack up against its closest peers?

We take the 8 same-industry companies most similar to SANG (similar size) and check what investors are paying for each dollar of their revenue (or profits). If SANG is much more expensive on the same yardstick, that's a red flag — unless you have a specific reason it deserves a premium. For a leveraged business, EV/EBIT and FCF yield (both in the table) are usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)
EV / Sales?EV / Sales — For every $1 of yearly revenue, this is how many dollars investors pay to own the whole business (including debt).
Why it matters: Works for pre-profit growth companies where P/E and FCF don't apply. The most apples-to-apples cross-company multiple because it ignores accounting choices.
Reference: 1–3x for mature companies · 4–10x for software/SaaS · 10–20x for hypergrowth · >20x is rare and demanding
Full explanation →
0.6x / 1.7x / 2.6x
EV / Gross Profit?EV / Gross Profit — Enterprise value divided by gross profit — the multiple paid for what each dollar of sales contributes after direct costs.
Why it matters: More refined than EV/Sales for high-margin businesses (software, marketplaces) where gross margin is the real economic engine.
Reference: 8–15x for SaaS · 15–25x for hypergrowth software · >30x demanding
Full explanation →
1.7x / 1.9x / 2.3x

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 8 same-industry peers; implausible multiples excluded.

Peer-implied value check
Peer-implied price isn't available for SANG right now. The multiples table above still works as context.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (8)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/Sales EV/GPEV/EBIT FCF Yield
GOAI Eva Live Inc Software & IT Services $119M 7.0x 14.4x 33.8%
TEAD Teads Holding Co. Software & IT Services $112M 0.6x 1.7x 137.7%
PODC PodcastOne, Inc. Software & IT Services $134M 2.6x 14.7%
HCAT Health Catalyst, Inc. Software & IT Services $102M 0.8x 42.4%
DOYU DouYu International Holdings Ltd Software & IT Services $158M 0.3x 2.3x232.5x 53.2%
LAWR Robot Consulting Co., Ltd. Software & IT Services $172M
UBXG U-BX Technology Ltd. Software & IT Services $73M 2.5x 289.9x 9.2%
ZIP ZIPRECRUITER, INC. Software & IT Services $231M 1.7x 1.9x 9.4%

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The F-score compares two consecutive years of income, cash-flow and balance-sheet data. We have 5 years of income data for this filer, but no machine-readable cash-flow statement — so several of the nine checks have no input at all. We show nothing rather than score a partial year against itself. The reported figures in the financial tables below are unaffected.

Price$3.61
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Sangoma Technologies Corp because its latest net income is negative and it has only been profitable in 1 out of the last 5 years, indicating erratic cash flows. Valuing SANG would require a detailed understanding of its future revenue growth trajectory and margin expansion, which are not currently generating positive free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
. Investors are likely betting on the company's ability to achieve sustained profitability and expand its market share in the communications software and services sector. The primary quantifiable risk is the continued negative net income.

⚠️ FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp stock anatomy showing per-share revenue, operating expenses, free cash flow, and debt
What's free cash flow / what do these mean?

Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.

Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.

Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.

Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
Operating cash flow must turn consistently positive and grow significantly to demonstrate the viability of its business model and fund future expansion without relying on external capital.
🐻 The Bear Case
Continued negative net income implies ongoing cash burn, which could lead to further dilution or financial strain if not reversed, as indicated by the 'FCF?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
negative' flag.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Quarterly revenue growth acceleration
  • Improvement in gross and operating margins
  • Positive free cash flow generation

The trend, in plain numbers (FY2024 → FY2025, latest reported)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

✅ Improving
  • Still unprofitable at -$5.0M — loss narrowing.

Nothing was clearly worsening year-over-year.

Management & Leadership

Bill Wignall has served as the President and CEO of Sangoma Technologies Corp since 2011, leading the company's strategic direction and growth initiatives in the unified communications market. He has overseen significant acquisitions and product expansions during his tenure.

Bill Wignall
President & Chief Executive Officer
David Moore
Chief Financial Officer

What They Make

Sangoma Technologies Corp provides unified communications and as-a-service (UCaaS) solutions, including voice over IP (VoIP) phones, gateways, and software, primarily serving small to medium-sized businesses and enterprises.

End Markets

Small to Medium BusinessesEnterprise CommunicationsCloud Communications

Revenue Drivers

UCaaS Subscriptions
Hardware Sales
Support & Maintenance Services
Market Cap: 120.1MBeta: 0.60

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Cost-effective communication solutions
Integrated voice, video, and messaging
Scalable cloud-based services
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer No machine-readable cash-flow statement in this filer's EDGAR submissions — common for foreign private issuers (20-F/6-K). That makes a discounted-cash-flow valuation impossible: there is no free cash flow to discount. It does not affect the income-statement or balance-sheet figures below.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market is pricing SANG based on expectations of future revenue growth in the unified communications sector, rather than current cash flow, given its negative net income. The market may be assigning value to the potential for increased adoption of its UCaaS solutions and expansion into new geographic markets, which is not in the model. The low franchise/durability score of 0/5 suggests the market perceives significant competitive pressures or lack of a strong economic moat, making future profitability uncertain.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Subscription fees for UCaaS platforms
Sales of communication hardware (phones, gateways)
Professional services and technical support contracts

The company funds itself primarily through equity raises and debt, as indicated by its negative free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
, and does not currently pay dividends or engage in significant share buybacks.

Growth / Revenue DCF

No cash flow statement data available - using revenue/margin growth model as fallback.

Show advanced inputs
Revenue Growth15.0%

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project product, services and recurring/cloud lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

High-growth technology

Moat Signals

Proprietary software platforms
Integrated product ecosystem
Customer switching costs for UCaaS

Net income has been negative in the latest period, with profitability in only 1 out of the last 5 years.

Geography & Markets

Sangoma Technologies Corp is headquartered in Canada and operates globally, serving customers across North America, Europe, and other international markets, though specific geographic revenue percentages are not available from current data sources.

Geographic Risks

Geographic concentration risk in North America (qualitative)
Intense competition in the unified communications market

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape bearish
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
40.6NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$4.03Price below (-10.4%)Price below its 50-day average = near-term downtrend.
200-Day Average$4.81Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (4 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (4)
  • FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.
  • INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive. Model may not be appropriate.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Illiquidity discount 15% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Sangoma Technologies Corp's SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
2025-5.0M$-0.15
2024-8.7M$-0.26
2023-29.0M$-0.87
2022-110.8M$-3.33
2021282,000$0.01

Balance Sheet

Total Assets346.5M
Total Liabilities92.4M
Equity

Similar companies worth a look

Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.

PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $SANG — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $SANG on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.