Liberty Media Corp (FWONA) Stock Analysis

Price updated today · SEC data refreshed 23 days ago · Not investment advice

Liberty Media Corp

FWONA Communication Services Television Broadcasting Stations📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 44/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 33/100 → +14.1
leverage 40/100 · FCF trend 25/100 · Altman Z not scored — input unavailable (see Financial Health)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 71/100 → +22.3
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 30/100 → +7.7
Total44/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). It excludes the the Altman Z score, whose retained-earnings input this filer does not report separately, which relies on a proxied (estimated) input. See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $93.46 · today 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 23 days ago

How to read FWONA

We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reported earnings & margins ↓
    What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
  2. 2 Balance sheet & book value ↓
    Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
  3. 3 Who's selling & betting against it ↓
    Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
One rule first: never trade out of fear — and that includes the fear of missing out. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not data. If you can't point to the evidence behind a trade, you're more likely to lose. So whichever of these you are, check the data below before you act.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ The price sits far above our cash-flow model

Our DCF for FWONA lands well below today's price. For a non-cyclical that usually means the market is pricing in growth far beyond recent cash flows (or there's a data quirk), so we don't headline a single fair-value number.

What to use instead: The Reverse-DCF shows exactly how much growth the price demands — decide whether that's realistic. Pair it with peer multiples.

This note is only about the single DCF fair-value number — FWONA's full financial statements, health scores, and written analysis are all below.

ⓘ Why does FWONA trade at $93.46?

Liberty Media Corp has 2.92 billion shares outstanding. At $93.46 per share, the market values all outstanding FWONA equity at $273.0 billion. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash — and it matters here because FWONA carries substantial debt. The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values FWONA in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…

⚠ We found only 1 genuine same-industry (Television Broadcasting Stations) comparable — fewer than the 4 we require for a reliable median. The 5 names in the table below therefore include 4 broader Communication Services names marked fallback, whose business models and margins differ — which is why any median below is computed over that wider set, not over true comparables. So we do not derive a peer-implied share value here. Read the multiples as rough context only.

How does FWONA stack up against its closest peers?

Ideally we compare FWONA only to same-industry peers, but too few exist in our universe right now, so the basket below mixes in broader-sector names. Treat the multiples as rough context, not a valuation. For a leveraged business, EV/EBIT and FCF yield (both in the table) are usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 5 peers (broad — see caveat); implausible multiples excluded.

What FWONA would be worth at the median peer's multiple
We're not showing a peer-implied price for FWONA: with only 1 genuine same-industry comparable, a median built partly from broader-sector names would be misleading. Lean on the DCF above; use the multiples table only as loose context.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (5)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/Sales EV/GP EV/EBIT FCF Yield
FWONK Liberty Media Corp Television Broadcasting St $283.5B 64.4x 500.2x 0.5%
TBB AT&T INC. Telecommunications ·fallback $146.1B 1.2x 6.4x 12.5%
VEON VEON Ltd. Telecommunications ·fallback $100.4B 22.8x 0.8%
TKC TURKCELL ILETISIM HIZMETLERI A S Telecommunications ·fallback $89.3B
FBYDP Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Entertainment & Recreation ·fallback $84.3B 5,659.5x 0.0%

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
n/a
Not reliably computable

We can't produce a trustworthy Altman Z here: retained earnings weren't separately reported in our data, so a core input would have to be fabricated. Rather than show a categorical "distress" verdict from an invented number, we mark it unavailable. The classic manufacturing-calibrated model also fits asset-light businesses like this one poorly. Judge financial health from the leverage, cash position, and the measurable Piotroski checks instead.

Piotroski checks
6 passed · 2 failed · 1 n/a
Partial result, not a standard F-score: 6 of 8 measurable checks passed. 1 of the 9 standard checks couldn't be measured, so this is scored out of 8, not 9 — it isn't comparable to a published F-score.
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income $555.0M in the latest year.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $908.0M (was $567.0M the prior year).
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $908.0M vs net income $555.0M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets 3.6% vs -15.9% a year ago.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    Long-term debt is 32.8% of assets vs 22.8% a year ago ($5,048.0M now).
    Why this matters: Rising debt relative to assets means more risk and more cash going to interest instead of shareholders. Falling debt is a sign of strengthening.
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 1.46x vs 2.95x a year ago.
    Why this matters: The current ratio compares assets it can turn to cash within a year against bills due within a year. Below 1.0 means it may struggle to cover near-term obligations.
  • Share count (dilution)
    Share count held roughly flat (2,921.1M → 2,921.1M year-over-year).
  • · Pricing power (gross margin) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 0.29x vs 0.28x a year ago.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

What if you assume different inputs?

Here's where we land — and what happens if you change the assumptions. Drag the sliders to set your own Discount Rate?Discount Rate — The annual return you demand for taking single-stock risk instead of buying a safe Treasury or index fund.
Why it matters: Higher discount rate = stricter valuation (a stock has to produce more cash to be worth holding). Lower = more generous.
Reference: 8–12% is standard · 9–10% matches S&P 500 historical return · Below 7% is illogical for single-stock risk
Full explanation →
(the annual return you demand for single-stock risk) and terminal growth; the value updates live so you can see whether the stock looks cheaper or richer. The discount rate starts at 10.0%, the figure our model used for FWONA. Open Advanced to also change beta, growth and the rate path.

Note: no headline intrinsic value is published for this stock (the valuation is held for a data-quality reason — see the notes above). The calculator below is a what-if tool: the values it produces are your assumptions played out, not our estimate.

4.5% (risk-free)9-10% normal18% (deep-risk)
0%2-3% (GDP)5% (rarely sustainable)

A full intrinsic value isn't shown for FWONA because the valuation is currently held for a data-quality reason (see the guardrail notes above). The reverse-DCF reading still works — it needs only the price and cash flow — but we won't publish a forward value until the underlying data passes our checks.

For comparison — the revenue growth today's price already assumes

⚙ Advanced — tinker with every input (beta, growth, rate path, margin → full intrinsic value)
Where the discount rate comes from — discount rate = risk-free + beta × equity-risk-premium
What you'd earn risk-free from government bonds — the floor under every other rate. Slide it down to model the market expecting rate cuts (value rises); up for higher-for-longer.
The extra yearly return investors demand for owning stocks instead of safe bonds — the price of risk. History runs ~4.5–6.5%; we default to 5.5% (slightly conservative). It's an estimate, not a law — lower it if you think equities are less risky than that.
Inflation quietly eats returns: a 9% gain at 3% inflation is only ~6% in real purchasing power. The intrinsic value above is already in today's dollars (a nominal DCF cancels inflation out of both growth and the discount rate), so this doesn't change the value — it shows what's left of your return after the tax.
Higher beta → higher discount rate (sets the rate above). 1.0 = moves with the market.
What you think FWONA can grow revenue for ~5 years, then fades to terminal.
For a pre-profit company: the % of revenue that eventually becomes free cash flow once mature. (Our published value uses the sector norm.)
All inputs start at the values our model used.

    Copy shareable link to this scenario →

    Price$93.46
    Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. See Reverse DCF and Football Field below.

    A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
    Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
    Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
    Full explanation →
    (DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Liberty Media Corp due to its revenue declining significantly by -20.8% per year over the last four years. While operating cash flow is positive, the model relies on revenue and margin projections, and the market may be pricing optionality related to its diverse media holdings, which is not captured by backward-looking cash flow models. The biggest risk to our assumptions is that the revenue decline continues, making the modeled 2.0% growth rate overly optimistic.

    ⚠️ Revenue/margin projection model used - trailing FCF may understate growth runway at current scale.

    As of 23 days ago

    Anatomy of a share

    What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

    FWONA Liberty Media Corp stock anatomy showing per-share revenue, operating expenses, free cash flow, and debt
    12.4%
    profit
    Where each $1 of revenue goes
    Net profit — 12.4¢ of every dollar ($0.19/sh — latest fiscal-year net income per share)
    Costs & taxes — 87.6¢ (on $1.53 revenue/sh)
    Net margin = net income ÷ revenue (most recent fiscal year).
    Plain English: $93/share buys $1.53 of revenue per share per year, generates $0.19 of net income per current share, and $0.26 of free cash flow per share. Each share carries $1.75 of debt.
    What's free cash flow / what do these mean?

    Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.

    Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.

    Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.

    Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.

    What you actually need to decide

    Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

    🐂 The Bull Case
    Underlying cash flow must stabilize or grow around the modeled business rate of 2.0% while debt reduction continues, and the company successfully monetizes or spins off its various media assets.
    🐻 The Bear Case
    The revenue decline of -20.8% per year continues or accelerates, leading to further erosion of operating cash flow and asset values, making the current valuation unsustainable.
    📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
    • Stabilization or growth in segment-level revenues
    • Announcements of strategic asset sales or spin-offs
    • Further reduction in long-term debt below $5048M

    The trend, in plain numbers (2024 → 2025)

    Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

    ✅ Improving
    • Revenue grew +23% to $4.48B.
    • Free cash flow rose to $768.0M.
    • Swung to a profit of $555.0M (from a loss the prior year).
    ⚠ Worsening

    Nothing clearly worsening year-over-year.

    Management & Leadership

    Liberty Media Corporation is led by President and CEO Greg Maffei, who has held the position since 2005. John Malone serves as Chairman of the Board, a role he has held for many years, overseeing the company's strategic direction and various media investments.

    Greg Maffei
    President and CEO
    John Malone
    Chairman of the Board

    What They Make

    Liberty Media Corporation operates and invests in a broad range of media, communications, and entertainment businesses. The company generates revenue primarily from subscribers, advertisers, and event promoters across its various holdings.

    End Markets

    Live EntertainmentSports BroadcastingDigital Media

    Revenue Drivers

    Subscription fees
    Advertising sales
    Event ticket sales
    Market Cap: 273.0BBeta: 0.58

    Why Is It Priced Like This?

    Why Customers Pay

    Exclusive content access
    Premium sports experiences
    Diverse entertainment offerings
    No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer Our own data-quality checks flagged this company's figures as inconsistent enough that a discounted-cash-flow value would be misleading, so we hold it. This is our judgement about model reliability, not a gap in the company's reporting.

    What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

    The market is likely pricing Liberty Media based on expectations for future growth and potential strategic realignments within its diverse portfolio, rather than its current declining revenue trend of -20.8% per year. The market may be assigning value to potential spin-offs or re-ratings of its underlying assets, which is not in the model, given the company's history of complex corporate structures and asset management.

    Business Model & Valuation

    How They Make Money

    Subscription revenue from media properties
    Advertising revenue from broadcast and digital platforms
    Event and ticketing revenue from live entertainment

    The company has significantly reduced its long-term debt from $15699M to $5048M, indicating a focus on balance sheet deleveraging.

    Growth / Revenue DCF

    FCF per share ($0.26) is <0.3% of price ($89) - FCF is too small to drive a meaningful DCF. Using revenue/margin growth model.

    Show advanced inputs
    RevenueGrowth2.0%

    What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project retransmission fees, core & political advertising, digital — nor reverse compensation or subscriber attrition independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

    Maturity & Competitive Position

    Mature cyclical broadcaster

    Moat Signals

    Ownership of unique media assets
    Established brand recognition in entertainment
    Strategic investment capabilities

    Revenue has been declining at -20.8% per year over the last four years, despite positive net income in 4 out of 5 years.

    Geography & Markets

    Liberty Media Corporation is US-headquartered with significant international exposure through its various media and entertainment holdings, though exact geographic segment splits are not available from current data sources.

    Geographic Risks

    Concentration risk in media and entertainment sectors
    Regulatory changes impacting broadcasting and content distribution

    Market Signals

    These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

    Model neutral, tape bullish
    RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
    Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
    Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
    Full explanation →
    (14)
    52.4NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
    MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
    Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
    Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
    Full explanation →
    BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
    50-Day Average$85.46Price above (+9.4%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
    200-Day Average$84.39Price aboveThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
    50 vs 200 CrossGolden50-day above 200-dayA "golden cross" — the medium trend has overtaken the long trend (often read as bullish).

    Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

    Data Quality & Risk Flags (6 notes — click to expand/collapse)

    Guardrail Notes (6)
    • Revenue/margin projection model used - trailing FCF may understate growth runway at current scale.
    • Terminal growth set to 1.6% — the lowest of the applicable caps (binding: 80% of near-term growth (2%)). We use one effective terminal rate everywhere on the page.
    • Price is 19.5x model IV - market may be pricing optionality, narrative catalysts, or margin expansion beyond what trailing cash flows support.
    • Extreme valuation: the price is far above the model output for a non-cyclical — likely dominated by a data issue. The model value is suppressed.
    • VALUATION HELD (EXTREME_MODEL_GAP): per-share values suppressed due to the model output failed plausibility checks.
    • Extreme valuation gap (P/IV null): result may be dominated by model assumptions, share count issues, or sector-specific dynamics. Treat as low confidence.

    Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

    From Liberty Media Corp's SEC filings (EDGAR).

    Income (5yr)

    YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
    20254.5B555.0M$0.19
    20243.7B-2.1B$-0.71
    20233.6B761.0M$0.26
    20223.2B1.8B$0.62
    202111.4B398.0M$0.14

    Cash Flow (5yr)

    YearOperating CFCapEx− SBCFree Cash Flow
    2025 908.0M 119.0M 21.0M 768.0M
    2024 567.0M 75.0M 30.0M 462.0M
    2023 651.0M 461.0M 27.0M 163.0M
    2022 578.0M 309.0M 28.0M 241.0M
    2021 2.4B 440.0M 256.0M 1.7B

    How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: 908.0M − 119.0M − 21.0M (stock-based comp) = 768.0M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a projected from revenue × terminal margin, not this single year.

    Balance Sheet

    Total Assets15.4B
    Total Liabilities6.9B
    Equity7.8B
    Total Debt5.1B
    PG
    Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
    ⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed 23 days ago (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
    🔔 Follow $FWONA — free insider alerts
    One email when an insider buys $FWONA on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.