RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX) Stock Analysis

Price updated yesterday · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

RMAX Real Estate Real Estate Services📄 SEC filings ↗ CUSIP 75524W108
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 60/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 63/100 → +27.0
leverage 92/100 · FCF trend 25/100 · Altman Z not scored — input unavailable (see Financial Health)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 79/100 → +24.8
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 33/100 → +8.5
Total60/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). It excludes the Altman Z score, whose retained-earnings input this filer does not report separately. See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $12.36 · yesterday 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read RMAX

We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reported earnings & margins ↓
    What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
  2. 2 Balance sheet & book value ↓
    Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
  3. 3 Who's selling & betting against it ↓
    Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ A share-count quirk blocked the per-share math

The share count we read for RMAX looks wrong — common for multi-class / founder-controlled filers that report shares per share-class. That makes per-share figures (including intrinsic value) misleading, so we suppressed them. The company's total financials below are sound.

What to use instead: Lean on the totals — revenue, net income, cash flow — and the balance sheet. Multi-class share counts are being corrected; once fixed, the per-share valuation returns automatically.

This note is only about the single DCF fair-value number — RMAX's full financial statements, health scores, and written analysis are all below.

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski-style checks (partial — not a standard F-score)
6 passed · 1 failed · 2 n/a
Partial result, not a standard F-score: 6 of 7 measurable checks passed. 2 of the 9 standard checks couldn't be measured, so this is scored out of 7, not 9 — it isn't comparable to a published F-score.
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income $13.4M in FY2025.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $40.9M (was $59.7M the prior year).
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $40.9M vs net income $13.4M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets 2.3% vs 1.4% a year ago.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    Long-term debt is 74.2% of assets vs 75.0% a year ago ($432.2M of $582.5M assets).
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 1.69x vs 1.41x a year ago.
  • · Share count (dilution) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • · Pricing power (gross margin) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 0.50x vs 0.53x a year ago.
    Why this matters: Asset turnover measures how much revenue each dollar of assets generates. Rising = more productive use of the asset base.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

Price$12.36
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. because its revenue is declining, making future cash flow projections unreliable for a growth-oriented model. Investors are likely focused on the company's ability to stabilize and reverse its revenue decline, leveraging its established franchise model. The #1 quantifiable risk is the ongoing -3%/yr revenue decline, which could erode profitability if not addressed.

⚠️ Revenue declining (+1 more flags below)

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
For the stock to work, RE/MAX must reverse its -3%/yr revenue decline, demonstrating its franchise model can adapt to market changes and attract new agents/brokers.
🐻 The Bear Case
The persistent -3%/yr revenue decline, if continued, implies a shrinking core business that could eventually pressure its positive net income and operating cash flow.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Quarterly revenue growth stabilization or reversal
  • Growth in franchise count or agent count
  • Improvements in net income margins

The trend, in plain numbers (FY2024 → FY2025, latest reported)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

✅ Improving
  • Net income grew +66% to $13.4M.
⚠ Worsening
  • Revenue fell -5% to $291.6M.
  • Free cash flow fell to $16.9M.

Management & Leadership

Nick Bailey serves as the President and CEO of RE/MAX, a role he has held since early 2023, overseeing the company's global operations and strategic direction. Erik Carlson is the CEO of RE/MAX Holdings, Inc., appointed in 2023, leading the broader corporate strategy. Dave Liniger co-founded RE/MAX in 1973 and remains involved as Chairman Emeritus.

Erik Carlson
Chief Executive Officer, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.
Nick Bailey
President and CEO, RE/MAX, LLC
Dave Liniger
Co-Founder and Chairman Emeritus

What They Make

RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. operates a global franchisor of real estate brokerage services, providing branding, technology, and support to real estate agents and brokers. Its customers are primarily independent real estate agents and brokerage owners.

End Markets

Residential Real Estate BrokerageMortgage OriginationReal Estate Technology

Revenue Drivers

Franchise fees
Brokerage services
Technology subscriptions
Beta: 1.15

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Global brand recognition and marketing
Brokerage support and training
Technology tools and platforms
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer We aren't publishing a discounted-cash-flow value here: the model's output failed our plausibility checks, so showing it would imply more precision than we have.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market is pricing RMAX based on its established brand and positive operating cash flow, despite declining revenue. Investors are likely betting on the company's ability to leverage its franchise model to stabilize and eventually grow revenue, given its consistent operating cash flow generation over the past five years.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Franchise fees
Brokerage services
Technology subscriptions

Free Cash Flow DCF

Standard FCF DCF: positive free cash flow in a sector suited for cash-flow-based valuation.

Show advanced inputs
Revenue Growth-3.0%
Historical Fcf Growth-24.5%
Sector Default4.0%
Best Estimate-0.9%
Methodblend(70% revenue_cagr, 30% sector)
Growth Basistotal

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project lots/units, inventory turnover and gross margin per unit independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Mature / low-growth

Moat Signals

Extensive global franchise network
Strong brand recognition in real estate
Established agent training and support systems

Revenue has been declining at -3%/yr over the last four years, from $330M to $292M.

Geography & Markets

RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. operates globally, with a significant presence in the United States and Canada, alongside international expansion across numerous countries. Exact geographic revenue mix is not available in current filings.

Geographic Risks

Sensitivity to real estate market cycles and interest rate fluctuations
Competition from other real estate brokerage models and technology platforms

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape neutral - aligned.
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
57.2NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$7.93Price above (+55.9%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
200-Day Average$8.02Price aboveThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (9 notes — click to expand/collapse)

HIGH Revenue declining
MEDIUM Operating CF declining
Guardrail Notes (7)
  • Stock-based compensation equals 50% of pre-SBC free cash flow; FCF used here is net of SBC (a real shareholder-dilution cost), so it is lower than the headline GAAP cash-flow figure.
  • Terminal growth (3%) capped to 0% (80% of near-term growth -0.9%, floored to 0%).
  • Shares from unknown — per-share values may be less accurate.
  • Illiquidity discount 25% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Shares/market cap missing or defaulted; per-share valuation unreliable.
  • Shares defaulted to 1; IV is NOT meaningful — treat as data-unavailable.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.'s SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
2025291.6M13.4M
2024307.7M8.1M
2023325.7M-98.5M
2022353.4M10.8M
2021329.7M-24.6M

Cash Flow (5yr)

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
2025 40.9M 7.4M 16.6M 16.9M
2024 59.7M 6.6M 18.9M 34.2M
2023 28.3M 6.4M 19.5M 2.3M
2022 71.1M 9.9M 22.0M 39.2M
2021 42.4M 15.2M 34.3M -7.1M

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: 40.9M − 7.4M − 16.6M (SBC & adj.) = 16.9M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets582.5M
Total Liabilities611.5M
Equity452.4M
Total Debt432.2M
PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $RMAX — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $RMAX on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.