TWILIO INC (TWLO) Stock Analysis

Price updated today · SEC data refreshed 2 months ago · Not investment advice

TWILIO INC

TWLO Technology Software📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 33/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100 · Altman Z not scored — input unavailable (see Financial Health)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 55/100 → +17.3
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 28/100 → +7.2
Total33/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). It excludes the the Altman Z score, whose retained-earnings input this filer does not report separately, which relies on a proxied (estimated) input. See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $238.20 · today 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 2 months ago

How to read TWLO

We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reported earnings & margins ↓
    What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
  2. 2 Balance sheet & book value ↓
    Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
  3. 3 Who's selling & betting against it ↓
    Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
One rule first: never trade out of fear — and that includes the fear of missing out. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not data. If you can't point to the evidence behind a trade, you're more likely to lose. So whichever of these you are, check the data below before you act.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ A share-count quirk blocked the per-share math

The share count we read for TWLO looks wrong — common for multi-class / founder-controlled filers that report shares per share-class. That makes per-share figures (including intrinsic value) misleading, so we suppressed them. The company's total financials below are sound.

What to use instead: Lean on the totals — revenue, net income, cash flow — and the balance sheet. Multi-class share counts are being corrected; once fixed, the per-share valuation returns automatically.

This note is only about the single DCF fair-value number — TWLO's full financial statements, health scores, and written analysis are all below.

ⓘ Why does TWLO trade at $238.20?

TWILIO INC has 159.8 million shares outstanding. At $238.20 per share, the market values all outstanding TWLO equity at $38.1 billion. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash. The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values TWLO in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…

Football field: where does the price sit?

Different valuation methods produce different fair-value ranges depending on assumptions. Plotting them together lets you see at a glance whether the current price is reasonable across approaches, or only one specific lens.

EV / Sales (p25→p75)$125$505Current: $238.20$112$217$322$426$531
The current price sits inside each method's range — roughly fair on this blended view.

Industry multiples sourced from: industry: Software. See the Peer Basket section below for the peer comparison and its limited-comparables caveat.

How does TWLO stack up against its closest peers?

We take the 4 same-industry companies most similar to TWLO (similar size) and check what investors are paying for each dollar of their revenue (or profits). If TWLO is much more expensive on the same yardstick, that's a red flag — unless you have a specific reason it deserves a premium. For a leveraged business, EV/EBIT and FCF yield (both in the table) are usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)
EV / Sales?EV / Sales — For every $1 of yearly revenue, this is how many dollars investors pay to own the whole business (including debt).
Why it matters: Works for pre-profit growth companies where P/E and FCF don't apply. The most apples-to-apples cross-company multiple because it ignores accounting choices.
Reference: 1–3x for mature companies · 4–10x for software/SaaS · 10–20x for hypergrowth · >20x is rare and demanding
Full explanation →
3.8x / 8.5x / 18.9x
EV / Gross Profit?EV / Gross Profit — Enterprise value divided by gross profit — the multiple paid for what each dollar of sales contributes after direct costs.
Why it matters: More refined than EV/Sales for high-margin businesses (software, marketplaces) where gross margin is the real economic engine.
Reference: 8–15x for SaaS · 15–25x for hypergrowth software · >30x demanding
Full explanation →
7.8x / 15.4x / 28.1x

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 4 same-industry peers; implausible multiples excluded.

What TWLO would be worth at the median peer's multiple
$268.40
If TWLO traded at the typical (median) peer's EV/Sales multiple, the share price would be about $268.40.
Plain English: the stock currently trades at $238.20. That's 11.3% LESS than peer multiples imply — the stock looks cheap vs peers. Either an opportunity, or the market sees something wrong with this name that doesn't apply to peers.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (8)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/Sales EV/GP EV/EBIT FCF Yield
RBLX Roblox Corp Software $33.7B 7.1x 6.2%
SNOW Snowflake Inc. Software $88.3B 18.9x 28.1x 0.8%
SSNC SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc Software $16.3B 3.8x 7.8x 16.5x 8.2%
SAIL SailPoint, Inc. Software $10.6B 9.9x 15.4x 2.3%
TEAM Atlassian Corp Software ·fallback $28.2B 5.6x 6.7x 0.2%
RBRK Rubrik, Inc. Software ·fallback $15.4B 11.7x 14.7x 3.0%
U Unity Software Inc. Software ·fallback $13.3B 7.2x 9.7x 2.3%
HUBS HUBSPOT INC Software ·fallback $11.3B 3.6x 4.3x 1,531.4x 0.3%

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
n/a
Not reliably computable

We can't produce a trustworthy Altman Z here: retained earnings weren't separately reported in our data, so a core input would have to be fabricated. Rather than show a categorical "distress" verdict from an invented number, we mark it unavailable. The classic manufacturing-calibrated model also fits asset-light businesses like this one poorly. Judge financial health from the leverage, cash position, and the measurable Piotroski checks instead.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
6 / 9
Mediocre
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income $33.8M in the latest year.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $1,003.2M (was $716.2M the prior year).
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $1,003.2M vs net income $33.8M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets 0.3% vs -1.1% a year ago.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    Long-term debt is 10.2% of assets vs 10.0% a year ago ($992.3M now).
    Why this matters: Rising debt relative to assets means more risk and more cash going to interest instead of shareholders. Falling debt is a sign of strengthening.
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 4.03x vs 4.20x a year ago.
    Why this matters: The current ratio compares assets it can turn to cash within a year against bills due within a year. Below 1.0 means it may struggle to cover near-term obligations.
  • Share count (dilution)
    Share count declined 3.7% (165.9M → 159.8M year-over-year), so the no-dilution check passed. (This 1-year change differs from the ~4%/yr multi-year buyback CAGR the DCF cites.)
  • Pricing power (gross margin)
    Gross margin 48.9% vs 51.1% a year ago.
    Why this matters: Rising gross margin means stronger pricing power or lower input costs — a sign of competitive strength. Falling margin signals pressure.
  • Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 0.52x vs 0.45x a year ago.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

What if you assume different inputs?

Here's where we land — and what happens if you change the assumptions. Drag the sliders to set your own Discount Rate?Discount Rate — The annual return you demand for taking single-stock risk instead of buying a safe Treasury or index fund.
Why it matters: Higher discount rate = stricter valuation (a stock has to produce more cash to be worth holding). Lower = more generous.
Reference: 8–12% is standard · 9–10% matches S&P 500 historical return · Below 7% is illogical for single-stock risk
Full explanation →
(the annual return you demand for single-stock risk) and terminal growth; the value updates live so you can see whether the stock looks cheaper or richer. The discount rate starts at 10.0%, the figure our model used for TWLO. Open Advanced to also change beta, growth and the rate path.

Note: no headline intrinsic value is published for this stock (the valuation is held for a data-quality reason — see the notes above). The calculator below is a what-if tool: the values it produces are your assumptions played out, not our estimate.

4.5% (risk-free)9-10% normal18% (deep-risk)
0%2-3% (GDP)5% (rarely sustainable)

A full intrinsic value isn't shown for TWLO because the valuation is currently held for a data-quality reason (see the guardrail notes above). The reverse-DCF reading still works — it needs only the price and cash flow — but we won't publish a forward value until the underlying data passes our checks.

For comparison — the revenue growth today's price already assumes

⚙ Advanced — tinker with every input (beta, growth, rate path, margin → full intrinsic value)
Where the discount rate comes from — discount rate = risk-free + beta × equity-risk-premium
What you'd earn risk-free from government bonds — the floor under every other rate. Slide it down to model the market expecting rate cuts (value rises); up for higher-for-longer.
The extra yearly return investors demand for owning stocks instead of safe bonds — the price of risk. History runs ~4.5–6.5%; we default to 5.5% (slightly conservative). It's an estimate, not a law — lower it if you think equities are less risky than that.
Inflation quietly eats returns: a 9% gain at 3% inflation is only ~6% in real purchasing power. The intrinsic value above is already in today's dollars (a nominal DCF cancels inflation out of both growth and the discount rate), so this doesn't change the value — it shows what's left of your return after the tax.
Higher beta → higher discount rate (sets the rate above). 1.0 = moves with the market.
What you think TWLO can grow revenue for ~5 years, then fades to terminal.
For a pre-profit company: the % of revenue that eventually becomes free cash flow once mature. (Our published value uses the sector norm.)
All inputs start at the values our model used.

    Copy shareable link to this scenario →

    Price$238.20
    Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. See Reverse DCF and Football Field below.

    A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
    Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
    Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
    Full explanation →
    (DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Twilio due to its high-growth stage and the unreliability of its free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
    Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
    Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
    Full explanation →
    as a valuation base, as indicated by the base metric being less than 0.5% of the price. Investors are likely betting on continued revenue growth and the company's ability to scale its platform. The number one quantifiable risk is the significant stock-based compensation, which equals 60% of pre-SBC?SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) — Paying employees with company shares instead of cash.
    Why it matters: It's a real cost — it dilutes your ownership — so we subtract it from free cash flow even though accounting rules add it back, which would otherwise flatter cash-heavy tech companies.
    Reference: Can be 10–30% of revenue at high-growth software firms.
    Full explanation →
    free cash flow, indicating substantial shareholder dilution.

    ⚠️ Stock-based compensation equals 60% of pre-SBC free cash flow; FCF used here is net of SBC (a real shareholder-dilution cost), so it is lower than the headline GAAP cash-flow figure.

    As of 2 months ago

    Anatomy of a share

    What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

    TWLO TWILIO INC stock anatomy showing per-share revenue, operating expenses, free cash flow, and debt
    0.7%
    profit
    Where each $1 of revenue goes
    Net profit — 0.7¢ of every dollar ($0.21/sh — latest fiscal-year net income per share)
    Costs & taxes — 99.3¢ (on $31.71 revenue/sh)
    Net margin = net income ÷ revenue (most recent fiscal year).
    Plain English: $238/share buys $31.71 of revenue per share per year, generates $0.21 of net income per current share, and $2.52 of free cash flow per share. Each share carries $6.21 of debt.
    What's free cash flow / what do these mean?

    Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.

    Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.

    Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.

    Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.

    What you actually need to decide

    Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

    🐂 The Bull Case
    Twilio must sustain its revenue growth rate above current levels and demonstrate consistent profitability, building on the latest positive net income, to justify its valuation.
    🐻 The Bear Case
    The significant stock-based compensation, equaling 60% of pre-SBC?SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) — Paying employees with company shares instead of cash.
    Why it matters: It's a real cost — it dilutes your ownership — so we subtract it from free cash flow even though accounting rules add it back, which would otherwise flatter cash-heavy tech companies.
    Reference: Can be 10–30% of revenue at high-growth software firms.
    Full explanation →
    free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
    Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
    Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
    Full explanation →
    , poses a substantial dilution risk to shareholders if not managed effectively as the company scales.
    📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
    • Acceleration in revenue growth rates
    • Improvement in net income profitability
    • Reduction in stock-based compensation as a percentage of revenue

    The trend, in plain numbers (2024 → 2025)

    Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

    ✅ Improving
    • Revenue grew +14% to $5.07B.
    • Free cash flow rose to $402.8M.
    • Swung to a profit of $33.8M (from a loss the prior year).
    ⚠ Worsening
    • Gross margin shrank to 49% (-2 pts).

    Management & Leadership

    Jeff Lawson is the co-founder and CEO of Twilio, having led the company since its inception. Khozema Shipchandler serves as President of Twilio Communications, overseeing the core messaging and voice products.

    Jeff Lawson
    Chief Executive Officer
    Khozema Shipchandler
    President, Twilio Communications

    What They Make

    Twilio provides a cloud communications platform that allows developers to programmatically make and receive phone calls, send and receive text messages, and perform other communication functions. Its customers are businesses across various industries looking to embed communication capabilities into their applications.

    End Markets

    Software DevelopmentCustomer EngagementDigital Transformation

    Revenue Drivers

    Programmable Messaging
    Programmable Voice
    Email
    Market Cap: 38.1BBeta: 1.37

    Why Is It Priced Like This?

    Why Customers Pay

    Enables rapid integration of communication features
    Scalable infrastructure for global reach
    Reduces need for in-house communication infrastructure
    No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer We aren't publishing a discounted-cash-flow value here: the model's output failed our plausibility checks, so showing it would imply more precision than we have.

    What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

    The market is pricing Twilio based on expectations of future revenue growth, which has been 15.6%/yr over four years, rather than current cash flow. Despite positive net income in the latest period, the FCF?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
    Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
    Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
    Full explanation →
    /share is a very small fraction of the price, suggesting investors are focused on the company's long-term potential and market expansion in cloud communications.

    Business Model & Valuation

    How They Make Money

    Usage-based fees for API calls (e.g., messages, minutes)
    Subscription fees for advanced features and software
    Sales of communication-related software and services

    The company funds itself through its operating cash flow, which has been positive in 3 out of the last 5 years, and has stable long-term debt.

    Free Cash Flow DCF

    Standard FCF DCF: positive free cash flow in a sector suited for cash-flow-based valuation. FCF negative in 3/5 years. High P/FCF (72x) - market pricing significant growth.

    Show advanced inputs
    RevenueGrowth15.6%
    HistoricalFcfGrowth3.0432
    SectorDefault12.0%
    BestEstimate14.5%
    Methodblend(70% revenue_cagr, 30% sector)+buyback(2.1%)
    GrowthBasistotal

    What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project product, services and recurring/cloud lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

    Maturity & Competitive Position

    High-growth technology

    Moat Signals

    Developer ecosystem and network effects
    High switching costs for integrated platforms
    Extensive API library and global reach

    Revenue has grown from $2842M to $5067M over four years.

    Geography & Markets

    Twilio is headquartered in the US and operates globally, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia, and other regions, though specific geographic revenue mix percentages are not available from current data sources.

    Geographic Risks

    Competition in the cloud communications platform market
    Reliance on developer adoption and usage

    Market Signals

    These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

    Model neutral, tape bullish
    RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
    Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
    Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
    Full explanation →
    (14)
    60.3NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
    MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
    Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
    Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
    Full explanation →
    BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
    50-Day Average$156.34Price above (+52.4%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
    200-Day Average$128.35Price aboveThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
    50 vs 200 CrossGolden50-day above 200-dayA "golden cross" — the medium trend has overtaken the long trend (often read as bullish).

    Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

    Data Quality & Risk Flags (7 notes — click to expand/collapse)

    Guardrail Notes (7)
    • Stock-based compensation equals 60% of pre-SBC free cash flow; FCF used here is net of SBC (a real shareholder-dilution cost), so it is lower than the headline GAAP cash-flow figure.
    • Latest FCF ($0.4B) is 11.9x net income ($0.0B) - using 3yr avg FCF to reduce one-time inflation.
    • Base metric ($0.5/sh) is <0.5% of price ($191) - FCF DCF output will be unreliable. Growth/revenue model would be more appropriate for this stock.
    • Per-share growth boosted by buybacks: the company is retiring 2.1% of its shares per year, which adds directly to per-share growth on top of business growth. Final per-share growth used by the model: 16.6%/yr.
    • Price is 16.6x model IV - market may be pricing optionality, narrative catalysts, or margin expansion beyond what trailing cash flows support.
    • Extreme valuation (P/IV 16.5853x, IV $11.49 vs price $190.64); output dominated by data/units issue (often a multi-class share-count mismatch). Suppressed.
    • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

    Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

    From TWILIO INC's SEC filings (EDGAR).

    Income (5yr)

    YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
    20255.1B33.8M$0.21
    20244.5B-109.4M$-0.66
    20234.2B-1.0B$-5.54
    20223.8B-1.3B$-6.86
    20212.8B-949.9M$-5.45

    Cash Flow (5yr)

    YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
    2025 1.0B 600.4M 402.8M
    2024 716.2M 616.6M 99.6M
    2023 414.8M 675.9M -261.1M
    2022 -254.4M 798.6M -1.1B
    2021 -58.2M 46.0M 632.3M -736.5M

    How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: 1.0B − — − 600.4M (SBC & adj.) = 402.8M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a trailing 3-year average, not this single year.

    Balance Sheet

    Total Assets9.8B
    Total Liabilities1.9B
    Equity7.8B
    Total Debt992.3M

    Similar companies worth a look

    Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.

    PG
    Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
    ⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
    🔔 Follow $TWLO — free insider alerts
    One email when an insider buys $TWLO on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.