Vertex, Inc. (VERX) Stock Analysis

Price updated today · SEC data refreshed 2 months ago · Not investment advice

Vertex, Inc.

VERX Technology Software📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 39/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 40/100 → +17.1
leverage 40/100 · Altman Z not scored — input unavailable (see Financial Health)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 48/100 → +15.1
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 28/100 → +7.2
Total39/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). It excludes the the Altman Z score, whose retained-earnings input this filer does not report separately, which relies on a proxied (estimated) input. See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $12.72 · today 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 2 months ago

How to read VERX

We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reported earnings & margins ↓
    What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
  2. 2 Balance sheet & book value ↓
    Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
  3. 3 Who's selling & betting against it ↓
    Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
One rule first: never trade out of fear — and that includes the fear of missing out. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not data. If you can't point to the evidence behind a trade, you're more likely to lose. So whichever of these you are, check the data below before you act.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ A share-count quirk blocked the per-share math

The share count we read for VERX looks wrong — common for multi-class / founder-controlled filers that report shares per share-class. That makes per-share figures (including intrinsic value) misleading, so we suppressed them. The company's total financials below are sound.

What to use instead: Lean on the totals — revenue, net income, cash flow — and the balance sheet. Multi-class share counts are being corrected; once fixed, the per-share valuation returns automatically.

This note is only about the single DCF fair-value number — VERX's full financial statements, health scores, and written analysis are all below.

Loading insider & short-seller data…

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski checks
7 passed · 1 failed · 1 n/a
Partial result, not a standard F-score: 7 of 8 measurable checks passed. 1 of the 9 standard checks couldn't be measured, so this is scored out of 8, not 9 — it isn't comparable to a published F-score.
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income $7.2M in the latest year.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $165.5M (was $164.8M the prior year).
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $165.5M vs net income $7.2M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets 0.6% vs -4.5% a year ago.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    Long-term debt is 26.6% of assets vs 28.7% a year ago ($337.5M now).
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 0.98x vs 1.00x a year ago — below 1.0, a caution flag.
    Why this matters: The current ratio compares assets it can turn to cash within a year against bills due within a year. Below 1.0 means it may struggle to cover near-term obligations.
  • · Share count (dilution) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • Pricing power (gross margin)
    Gross margin 64.3% vs 63.9% a year ago.
  • Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 0.59x vs 0.57x a year ago.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

Price$12.72
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. See Reverse DCF and Football Field below.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
valuation is not meaningful for Vertex, Inc. because while operating cash flow is positive, net income has only been positive in one of the last five years, indicating inconsistent profitability. Investors are likely focused on the company's consistent revenue growth and expanding gross margins, betting on its ability to scale profitability over time. The primary quantifiable risk is the current ratio being below 1, suggesting potential short-term liquidity challenges.

⚠️ Stock-based compensation equals 35% of pre-SBC free cash flow; FCF used here is net of SBC (a real shareholder-dilution cost), so it is lower than the headline GAAP cash-flow figure.

As of 2 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
The bull case hinges on Vertex's ability to convert its consistent revenue growth and expanding gross margins into sustained net profitability, moving beyond being profitable only 1/5 years.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest fundamental risk is the rising long-term debt, which has grown from $0M to $337M, combined with a current ratio below 1, implying potential future liquidity strain if not managed effectively.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Consistent positive net income in upcoming quarters
  • Improvement in the current ratio above 1
  • Continued revenue growth rates above 15%

The trend, in plain numbers (2024 → 2025)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

✅ Improving
  • Revenue grew +12% to $748.4M.
  • Free cash flow rose to $107.8M.
  • Swung to a profit of $7.2M (from a loss the prior year).
⚠ Worsening

Nothing clearly worsening year-over-year.

Roughly flat: Gross margin held to 64% (+0 pts).

Management & Leadership

Vertex, Inc. is led by CEO David DeStefano, who has been with the company for many years, including as CFO before becoming CEO. The company was founded by Ray West, who serves as Chairman of the Board. This leadership team has guided Vertex through its growth and public offering.

David DeStefano
Chief Executive Officer
Ray West
Chairman of the Board

What They Make

Vertex, Inc. provides tax technology solutions, including tax calculation, compliance, and reporting software. Its products are primarily used by large and medium-sized businesses to automate and manage their indirect tax processes.

End Markets

Enterprise softwareFinancial technologyTax compliance

Revenue Drivers

Subscription software sales
Professional services
Cloud-based solutions
Beta: 0.93

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Automates complex tax calculations
Ensures regulatory compliance
Reduces manual errors and audit risk
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer We aren't publishing a discounted-cash-flow value here: the model's output failed our plausibility checks, so showing it would imply more precision than we have.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market is pricing Vertex based on its consistent revenue growth of 15.2%/yr over four years and expanding gross margins, indicating a growing and efficient core business. Despite inconsistent net income, the positive and consistent operating cash flow suggests underlying business health, with investors likely anticipating future profit expansion as the company scales and matures.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Subscription fees for software licenses
Maintenance and support services
Consulting and implementation services

The company funds itself through operations, with stock-based compensation equaling 35% of pre-SBC?SBC (Stock-Based Compensation) — Paying employees with company shares instead of cash.
Why it matters: It's a real cost — it dilutes your ownership — so we subtract it from free cash flow even though accounting rules add it back, which would otherwise flatter cash-heavy tech companies.
Reference: Can be 10–30% of revenue at high-growth software firms.
Full explanation →
free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
, indicating dilution as a financing component. It does not currently pay dividends or engage in significant buybacks.

Free Cash Flow DCF

Standard FCF DCF: positive free cash flow in a sector suited for cash-flow-based valuation. FCF negative in 2/5 years.

Show advanced inputs
RevenueGrowth15.2%
HistoricalFcfGrowth82.3%
SectorDefault12.0%
BestEstimate14.2%
Methodblend(70% revenue_cagr, 30% sector)
GrowthBasistotal

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project product, services and recurring/cloud lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Growth stage

Moat Signals

Specialized tax domain expertise
Integration with enterprise systems
High switching costs for customers

Revenue has been consistently growing at 15.2%/yr over the last four years, from $426M to $748M.

Geography & Markets

Vertex, Inc. is headquartered in the US and serves a global customer base, though specific geographic revenue mix percentages are not available from current data sources.

Geographic Risks

Reliance on complex and changing tax regulations across multiple jurisdictions
Competition from other tax software providers and in-house solutions

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape neutral - aligned.
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
52.8NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$12.57Price above (+1.2%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
200-Day Average$18.54Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (7 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (7)
  • Stock-based compensation equals 35% of pre-SBC free cash flow; FCF used here is net of SBC (a real shareholder-dilution cost), so it is lower than the headline GAAP cash-flow figure.
  • Latest FCF ($0.1B) is 14.9x net income ($0.0B) - using 3yr avg FCF to reduce one-time inflation.
  • Shares from unknown — per-share values may be less accurate.
  • Illiquidity discount 25% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Shares/market cap missing or defaulted; per-share valuation unreliable.
  • Shares defaulted to 1; IV is NOT meaningful — treat as data-unavailable.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Vertex, Inc.'s SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
2025748.4M7.2M
2024666.8M-52.7M
2023572.4M-13.1M
2022491.6M-12.3M
2021425.5M-1.5M

Cash Flow (5yr)

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
2025 165.5M 57.8M 107.8M
2024 164.8M 71.8M 47.4M 45.6M
2023 74.3M 49.3M 33.9M -8.8M
2022 63.8M 45.5M 19.7M -1.4M
2021 90.3M 31.7M 26.2M 32.4M

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: 165.5M − — − 57.8M (SBC & adj.) = 107.8M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a trailing 3-year average, not this single year.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets1.3B
Total Liabilities1.0B
Equity258.9M
Total Debt337.5M
PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $VERX — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $VERX on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.