BANCO SANTANDER CHILE (BSAC) Stock Analysis

Price updated today · SEC data refreshed 22 days ago · Not investment advice

BANCO SANTANDER CHILE

BSAC Financial Services Banks📄 SEC filings ↗ CUSIP 05965X109
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 48/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (55%) 65/100 → +35.8
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (45%) 28/100 → +12.6
Total48/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $34.55 · today 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 22 days ago

How to read BSAC (bank / insurer)

Banks and insurers are valued on what they earn on their capital, not on free cash flow — a normal DCF misleads here.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Bank / Insurance lens (P/TBV + ROE) ↓
    Price-to-tangible-book versus return-on-equity is how analysts actually judge a bank cheap or rich.
  2. 2 Financial-health screens ↓
    Watch the trend in profitability and asset quality, not the (not-applicable) bankruptcy score.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
One rule first: never trade out of fear — and that includes the fear of missing out. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not data. If you can't point to the evidence behind a trade, you're more likely to lose. So whichever of these you are, check the data below before you act.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ BSAC is a thinly-disclosed company trading over-the-counter

It files little or nothing with the SEC — so our cash-flow models, financial statements, and U.S. insider data (Form 4) don't apply. What's still real: the live U.S. price and short positioning. Here's what we could pull from other sources:

As of December 31, 2023, Santander Chile had total assets of Ch$ 70,857,886 million (U.S.$ 81,031 million), outstanding gross loans (including interbank loans) at amortized cost of Ch$ 40,811,866 million (U.S.$ 46,671 million), total deposits of Ch$ 29,675,768 million (U.S.$ 33,936 million) and shareholders’ equity of Ch$ 4,367,159 millio…

📑 Read the real filings: latest SEC 6-K ↗

Identity, share count and tier from FINRA + OTC Markets; not a substitute for the home-market financial statements. Thin U.S. disclosure + OTC trading is itself a risk factor.

ⓘ Why does BSAC trade at $34.55?

BANCO SANTANDER CHILE's reported share count (188.45 billion) appears to be the home-market figure rather than the U.S.-listed share base, so we don't display a market capitalization computed from it — the result would be implausible. Treat per-share aggregates for this filer with caution until the share data reconciles. The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values BSAC in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not Applicable

Altman Z was calibrated on industrial firms and doesn't apply to banks or insurers — their balance sheets are dominated by loans/securities, not working capital. See the Bank Valuation Lens above for P/B, ROE and ROA — the metrics regulators and analysts actually use to assess bank solvency.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
Not Applicable

Piotroski F was built for non-financial firms (gross margin, asset turnover, current ratio all assume an industrial cost structure). For banks, the equivalent quality signals are efficiency ratio, net interest margin, and provision coverage — see the Bank Valuation Lens above.

Price$34.55
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. See Reverse DCF and Football Field below.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Banco Santander Chile because the model implies no positive equity value under current assumptions, as indicated by the 'INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive' flag. Investors are likely focused on the bank's core banking operations, its ability to generate consistent earnings, and its dividend policy, rather than free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
. The biggest risk to our assumptions is that the company's franchise durability score is 0/5, suggesting a lack of sustainable competitive advantages which could lead to future underperformance.

⚠️ Financial sector: using residual income model. IV = Book Value + PV(excess earnings).

As of 22 days ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
The bank must consistently generate positive excess earnings above its cost of equity, ensuring that its book value grows through retained earnings and that its core banking operations remain profitable in a competitive market.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest operating risk is that the bank's franchise durability score of 0/5 reflects a fundamental weakness in its competitive position, leading to sustained pressure on net interest margins or increasing credit losses that erode its earnings power.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Trends in net interest margin
  • Growth in loan portfolio quality
  • Changes in non-performing loan ratios

Management & Leadership

Claudio Melandri Hinojosa serves as the Chairman of Banco Santander Chile, having held the position since 2018. The CEO is Román Blanco, who assumed the role in 2022. The executive team focuses on maintaining the bank's market position and financial stability within Chile.

Claudio Melandri Hinojosa
Chairman
Román Blanco
Chief Executive Officer

What They Make

Banco Santander Chile is a full-service commercial bank offering a wide range of financial products and services to individuals, small and medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations. Its paying customers are individuals and businesses seeking banking, lending, and investment services.

End Markets

Retail bankingCommercial bankingWealth management

Revenue Drivers

Net interest income
Fee and commission income
Financial transaction income
Beta: 1.11

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Comprehensive financial services
Extensive branch network and digital channels
Reputation and stability of a major bank
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer No machine-readable cash-flow statement in this filer's EDGAR submissions — common for foreign private issuers (20-F/6-K). That makes a discounted-cash-flow valuation impossible: there is no free cash flow to discount. It does not affect the income-statement or balance-sheet figures below.

The income statement and balance sheet are also too incomplete here to substitute another lens honestly, so this page carries price, momentum and disclosure facts only.

The market is likely pricing Banco Santander Chile based on its book value and expectations for future excess earnings, given that a traditional DCF?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
model is not applicable and the residual income model is used. The 'Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions' flag suggests that current market pricing reflects a more optimistic outlook on future profitability or a different valuation approach than the model's conservative inputs.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Net interest income
Fee and commission income
Financial transaction income

Residual Income

Balance-sheet financial (Banks): residual income model - book value is meaningful anchor.

Show advanced inputs
SectorDefault8.0%

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project net interest income and fee-income lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Financial institution

Moat Signals

Established brand recognition
Extensive customer base
Regulatory barriers to entry

Geography & Markets

Banco Santander Chile primarily operates within Chile, serving a broad range of clients across the country. Specific geographic mix percentages are not available from current data sources.

Geographic Risks

Concentration risk within the Chilean economy
Regulatory and interest rate risks

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape bullish
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
53.6NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$32.20Price above (+7.3%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
200-Day Average$31.96Price aboveThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossGolden50-day above 200-dayA "golden cross" — the medium trend has overtaken the long trend (often read as bullish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (6 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (6)
  • Financial sector: using residual income model. IV = Book Value + PV(excess earnings).
  • INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive. Model may not be appropriate.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Model mismatch: residual income inappropriate for asset-light financial (BVPS $0.00 not meaningful vs price $33). Consider FCF model.
  • VALUATION HELD (MODEL_MISMATCH): per-share values suppressed due to the assigned valuation model does not fit this business.
  • Extreme valuation gap (P/IV null): result may be dominated by model assumptions, share count issues, or sector-specific dynamics. Treat as low confidence.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From BANCO SANTANDER CHILE's SEC filings (EDGAR).

PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed 22 days ago (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $BSAC — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $BSAC on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.