New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) Stock Analysis

Price updated today · SEC data refreshed 2 months ago · Not investment advice

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.

EDU Consumer Defensive Education📄 SEC filings ↗ CUSIP 647581107
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 41/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 46/100 → +19.7
leverage 20/100 · FCF trend 80/100 · Altman Z not scored — input unavailable (see Financial Health)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 45/100 → +14.1
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 28/100 → +7.2
Total41/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). It excludes the the Altman Z score, whose retained-earnings input this filer does not report separately, which relies on a proxied (estimated) input. See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $52.54 · today 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 2 months ago

How to read EDU

We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reported earnings & margins ↓
    What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
  2. 2 Balance sheet & book value ↓
    Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
  3. 3 Who's selling & betting against it ↓
    Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
One rule first: never trade out of fear — and that includes the fear of missing out. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not data. If you can't point to the evidence behind a trade, you're more likely to lose. So whichever of these you are, check the data below before you act.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ A share-count quirk blocked the per-share math

The share count we read for EDU looks wrong — common for multi-class / founder-controlled filers that report shares per share-class. That makes per-share figures (including intrinsic value) misleading, so we suppressed them. The company's total financials below are sound.

What to use instead: Lean on the totals — revenue, net income, cash flow — and the balance sheet. Multi-class share counts are being corrected; once fixed, the per-share valuation returns automatically.

This note is only about the single DCF fair-value number — EDU's full financial statements, health scores, and written analysis are all below.

ⓘ Why does EDU trade at $52.54?

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. has 1.63 billion shares outstanding. At $52.54 per share, the market values all outstanding EDU equity at $85.7 billion. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash (EDU carries little or no debt, so the two are close here). The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values EDU in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
n/a
Not reliably computable

We can't produce a trustworthy Altman Z here: retained earnings weren't separately reported in our data, so a core input would have to be fabricated. Rather than show a categorical "distress" verdict from an invented number, we mark it unavailable. Judge financial health from the leverage, cash position, and the measurable Piotroski checks instead.

Piotroski checks
7 passed · 1 failed · 1 n/a
Partial result, not a standard F-score: 7 of 8 measurable checks passed. 1 of the 9 standard checks couldn't be measured, so this is scored out of 8, not 9 — it isn't comparable to a published F-score.
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income $371.7M in the latest year.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $896.6M (was $1,122.6M the prior year).
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $896.6M vs net income $371.7M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets 4.8% vs 4.1% a year ago.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    Long-term debt is 0.0% of assets vs 0.0% a year ago ($0.0M now).
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 1.58x vs 1.80x a year ago.
    Why this matters: The current ratio compares assets it can turn to cash within a year against bills due within a year. Below 1.0 means it may struggle to cover near-term obligations.
  • Share count (dilution)
    Share count declined 2.3% (1,669.5M → 1,631.1M year-over-year), so the no-dilution check passed. (This 1-year change differs from the ~4%/yr multi-year buyback CAGR the DCF cites.)
  • · Pricing power (gross margin) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 0.63x vs 0.57x a year ago.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

What if you assume different inputs?

Here's where we land — and what happens if you change the assumptions. Drag the sliders to set your own Discount Rate?Discount Rate — The annual return you demand for taking single-stock risk instead of buying a safe Treasury or index fund.
Why it matters: Higher discount rate = stricter valuation (a stock has to produce more cash to be worth holding). Lower = more generous.
Reference: 8–12% is standard · 9–10% matches S&P 500 historical return · Below 7% is illogical for single-stock risk
Full explanation →
(the annual return you demand for single-stock risk) and terminal growth; the value updates live so you can see whether the stock looks cheaper or richer. The discount rate starts at 10.0%, the figure our model used for EDU. Open Advanced to also change beta, growth and the rate path.

Note: no headline intrinsic value is published for this stock (the valuation is held for a data-quality reason — see the notes above). The calculator below is a what-if tool: the values it produces are your assumptions played out, not our estimate.

4.5% (risk-free)9-10% normal18% (deep-risk)
0%2-3% (GDP)5% (rarely sustainable)

A full intrinsic value isn't shown for EDU because the valuation is currently held for a data-quality reason (see the guardrail notes above). The reverse-DCF reading still works — it needs only the price and cash flow — but we won't publish a forward value until the underlying data passes our checks.

For comparison — the revenue growth today's price already assumes

⚙ Advanced — tinker with every input (beta, growth, rate path, margin → full intrinsic value)
Where the discount rate comes from — discount rate = risk-free + beta × equity-risk-premium
What you'd earn risk-free from government bonds — the floor under every other rate. Slide it down to model the market expecting rate cuts (value rises); up for higher-for-longer.
The extra yearly return investors demand for owning stocks instead of safe bonds — the price of risk. History runs ~4.5–6.5%; we default to 5.5% (slightly conservative). It's an estimate, not a law — lower it if you think equities are less risky than that.
Inflation quietly eats returns: a 9% gain at 3% inflation is only ~6% in real purchasing power. The intrinsic value above is already in today's dollars (a nominal DCF cancels inflation out of both growth and the discount rate), so this doesn't change the value — it shows what's left of your return after the tax.
Higher beta → higher discount rate (sets the rate above). 1.0 = moves with the market.
What you think EDU can grow revenue for ~5 years, then fades to terminal.
For a pre-profit company: the % of revenue that eventually becomes free cash flow once mature. (Our published value uses the sector norm.)
All inputs start at the values our model used.

    Copy shareable link to this scenario →

    Price$52.54
    Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. See Reverse DCF and Football Field below.

    A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
    Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
    Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
    Full explanation →
    (DCF) valuation is not meaningful for EDU due to the model's reliance on trailing cash flows, which may understate its growth runway at the current scale. While the company has positive net income and operating cash flow, the market is likely focused on its revenue growth and potential for margin expansion beyond what historical data suggests. The primary quantifiable risk is its low franchise/durability score of 1/5, indicating potential competitive pressures or business model fragility.

    ⚠️ Operating CF declining

    As of 2 months ago

    Anatomy of a share

    What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

    EDU New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. stock anatomy showing per-share revenue, operating expenses, free cash flow, and debt
    7.6%
    profit
    Where each $1 of revenue goes
    Net profit — 7.6¢ of every dollar ($0.23/sh — latest fiscal-year net income per share)
    Costs & taxes — 92.4¢ (on $3.00 revenue/sh)
    Net margin = net income ÷ revenue (most recent fiscal year).
    Plain English: $53/share buys $3.00 of revenue per share per year, generates $0.23 of net income per current share, and $0.36 of free cash flow per share. Each share carries $0.00 of debt.
    What's free cash flow / what do these mean?

    Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.

    Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.

    Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.

    Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.

    What you actually need to decide

    Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

    🐂 The Bull Case
    For the stock to perform well, revenue must continue its positive trend of 3.5%/yr, and the company must demonstrate sustained profitability and margin expansion beyond what trailing cash flows support. This would validate the market's current pricing at 9.4x the model's intrinsic value?Intrinsic Value — Our DCF model's estimate of what each share is mathematically worth based on projected cash flows.
    Why it matters: Compare to current price. Below IV = potentially undervalued. Above IV = priced for growth that must actually happen.
    Reference: Model-derived; quality depends on data and assumptions.
    Full explanation →
    .
    🐻 The Bear Case
    The biggest fundamental risk is the low franchise/durability score of 1/5, which implies the company may struggle with competitive pressures or regulatory changes. If this continues, it could hinder future growth and profitability, making the current valuation unsustainable.
    📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
    • Quarterly revenue growth rates
    • Operating cash flow trends
    • Announcements regarding new educational programs or market expansion

    The trend, in plain numbers (2024 → 2025)

    Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

    ✅ Improving
    • Revenue grew +14% to $4.90B.
    • Net income grew +20% to $371.7M.
    ⚠ Worsening
    • Free cash flow fell to $594.7M.

    Management & Leadership

    Michael Minh Hong Yu is the founder, chairman, and CEO of New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc., a position he has held since its inception. He has been instrumental in guiding the company through various market changes and regulatory environments. Louis T. Hsieh serves as the President and Chief Financial Officer.

    Michael Minh Hong Yu
    Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer
    Louis T. Hsieh
    President and Chief Financial Officer

    What They Make

    New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. provides educational services, including after-school tutoring, test preparation, and language training, primarily to students in China.

    End Markets

    K-12 After-school TutoringTest Preparation ServicesLanguage Training

    Revenue Drivers

    Language Training and Test Preparation
    K-12 After-School Tutoring
    Online Education
    Market Cap: 85.7BBeta: 0.72

    Why Is It Priced Like This?

    Why Customers Pay

    Improved academic performance for students
    Enhanced English language proficiency
    Preparation for standardized tests and university admissions
    No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer We aren't publishing a discounted-cash-flow value here: the model's output failed our plausibility checks, so showing it would imply more precision than we have.

    What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

    The market is likely pricing EDU based on expectations for continued revenue growth, which has been 3.5% per year over the last four years, and its ability to maintain positive net income and operating cash flow. The market may be assigning value to the company's potential to expand its educational offerings or adapt to regulatory changes, which is not fully captured by a backward-looking cash flow model. The price is 9.4x the model's intrinsic value?Intrinsic Value — Our DCF model's estimate of what each share is mathematically worth based on projected cash flows.
    Why it matters: Compare to current price. Below IV = potentially undervalued. Above IV = priced for growth that must actually happen.
    Reference: Model-derived; quality depends on data and assumptions.
    Full explanation →
    , suggesting investors anticipate future margin expansion or growth beyond the modeled 3.5%.

    Business Model & Valuation

    How They Make Money

    Tuition fees from language training courses
    Fees from K-12 after-school tutoring programs
    Revenue from test preparation services

    The company funds itself primarily through its positive operating cash flow, which has been positive in 4 out of the last 5 years.

    Growth / Revenue DCF

    Extreme market premium (P/FCF 122x): market is pricing future growth far beyond current FCF. Using revenue/margin model.

    Show advanced inputs
    RevenueGrowth3.5%

    What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project its revenue segments independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

    Maturity & Competitive Position

    Growth / re-investment phase

    Moat Signals

    Established brand recognition in China's education sector
    Extensive network of learning centers
    Experienced teaching staff

    Revenue has been growing at 3.5% per year over the last four years, from $4277M to $4900M, and net income has been positive in 4 out of 5 years.

    Geography & Markets

    New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. primarily operates within China, with a significant presence across various cities. Exact geographic mix percentages are not available from current data sources.

    Geographic Risks

    Regulatory risk within the Chinese education sector
    Intense competition from other education providers in China

    Market Signals

    These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

    Model neutral, tape bearish
    RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
    Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
    Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
    Full explanation →
    (14)
    26.8OversoldHeavily sold off recently — sometimes a bounce setup, sometimes a falling knife.
    MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
    Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
    Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
    Full explanation →
    BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
    50-Day Average$53.76Price below (-2.3%)Price below its 50-day average = near-term downtrend.
    200-Day Average$54.44Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
    50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

    Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

    Data Quality & Risk Flags (6 notes — click to expand/collapse)

    MEDIUM Operating CF declining
    Guardrail Notes (5)
    • Revenue/margin projection model used - trailing FCF may understate growth runway at current scale.
    • Terminal growth (3%) capped to 2.8% (80% of near-term growth 3.5%).
    • Price is 9.4x model IV - market may be pricing optionality, narrative catalysts, or margin expansion beyond what trailing cash flows support.
    • Extreme valuation (P/IV 9.4218x, IV $4.86 vs price $45.79); output dominated by data/units issue (often a multi-class share-count mismatch). Suppressed.
    • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

    Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

    From New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.'s SEC filings (EDGAR).

    Income (5yr)

    YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
    20254.9B371.7M$0.23
    20244.3B309.6M$0.19
    20233.0B177.3M$0.11
    20223.1B-1.2B$-0.70
    20214.3B334.4M$0.20

    Cash Flow (5yr)

    YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
    2025 896.6M 241.9M 59.9M 594.7M
    2024 1.1B 249.4M 122.5M 750.8M
    2023 971.0M 143.0M 89.8M 738.2M
    2022 -1.3B 150.7M 133.0M -1.6B
    2021 1.1B 429.2M 68.9M 632.0M

    How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: 896.6M − 241.9M − 59.9M (SBC & adj.) = 594.7M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a projected from revenue × terminal margin, not this single year.

    Balance Sheet

    Total Assets7.8B
    Total Liabilities3.9B
    Equity3.7B
    PG
    Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
    ⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
    🔔 Follow $EDU — free insider alerts
    One email when an insider buys $EDU on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.