Tennessee Valley Authority (TVC) Stock Analysis

Price updated 4 days ago · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

Tennessee Valley Authority

TVC Utilities Electric Utilities📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 58/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 62/100 → +26.6
leverage 40/100 · FCF trend 90/100
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 58/100 → +18.2
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 50/100 → +12.9
Total58/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $23.82 · 4 days ago 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read TVC (regulated utility)

A regulator sets what a utility can earn, so its value tracks book value, dividend yield and payout — not a free-market DCF.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Utility lens (P/B, yield, payout) ↓
    These are the metrics utility-fund managers actually use.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ Using the right valuation lens for this business type

Standard DCF doesn't fit TVC well — but that's expected for this kind of business. The Utility Valuation Lens below uses the metrics actually used by analysts who value electric utilities. Reverse DCF + Football Field also work as cross-checks.

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Limited Reliability for Utilities

Regulated utilities carry high leverage backed by long-life assets and regulator-set rate-base returns — Altman Z flags both as distress signals even when the business is stable. See the Utility Lens above for the metrics that matter (P/B, dividend yield, payout ratio).

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
Not Applicable

Piotroski F's checks (operating cash flow, gross-margin trend, current ratio, asset turnover) assume an industrial cost structure, so they misread asset-heavy or financial businesses like this one — a healthy REIT, utility, pipeline, BDC/fund or holding company can score low for reasons that aren't weakness. See the sector lens above for the metrics that actually matter.

Price$23.82
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard DCF?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
valuation is not meaningful for Tennessee Valley Authority because it lacks dividend data and has rising long-term debt. Investors are likely focused on its consistent positive net income and operating cash flow, indicating operational stability despite its debt. The primary quantifiable risk is its current ratio of 0.92, indicating current liabilities exceed liquid assets.

⚠️ No dividend data. Assuming 3% yield.

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
Operating cash flow must remain consistently positive to cover capital expenditures and service its rising long-term debt, ensuring continued operational stability.
🐻 The Bear Case
The long-term debt is rising, and the current ratio is below 1, indicating potential liquidity challenges if not managed effectively.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Trends in long-term debt levels
  • Improvements in the current ratio
  • Stability of operating cash flow

The trend, in plain numbers (FY2024 → FY2025, latest reported)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

✅ Improving
  • Net income grew +20% to $1.36B.
⚠ Worsening
  • Free cash flow is negative at -$1.13B — the cash burn widened vs last year.

Management & Leadership

Jeff Lyash serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Tennessee Valley Authority, a position he has held since 2019. He leads the federal corporation in its mission to provide electricity, manage natural resources, and foster economic development in the Tennessee Valley.

Jeff Lyash
President and Chief Executive Officer
John Thomas
Chief Financial Officer

What They Make

The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a federally owned corporation in the United States that provides electricity, economic development, and natural resource management for the Tennessee Valley region.

End Markets

Residential electricity consumersIndustrial electricity consumersCommercial electricity consumers

Revenue Drivers

Electricity sales to local power companies
Direct electricity sales to industries
Transmission services
Beta: 0.35

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Reliable and affordable electricity
Flood control and navigation benefits
Economic development and job creation
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer This company's reported free cash flow is negative, so a discounted-cash-flow valuation has no positive cash stream to discount. That is a fact about the business, not missing data — the reported figures below are complete.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market likely prices TVA based on its consistent positive net income and operating cash flow, which have been positive for the latest 5 years, indicating operational stability. Despite rising long-term debt, its essential service and federal backing provide a perceived safety, though its current ratio below 1 suggests liquidity concerns.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Electricity generation and sales
Transmission and distribution services
Environmental and land management

TVA funds itself primarily through revenue from electricity sales and debt issuance, as no dividend data is available.

Dividend Discount

Utility (Electric Utilities): dividend discount model - growth is regulated and yield is the primary driver.

Show advanced inputs

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project rate-base growth, allowed ROE and dividend growth independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Dividend compounder

Moat Signals

Federal government ownership and backing
Integrated power generation and transmission infrastructure
Monopoly in its service territory

Net income has been positive for the latest 5 years, and operating cash flow has been positive for the latest 5 years.

Geography & Markets

The Tennessee Valley Authority primarily operates within the Tennessee Valley region of the United States, serving parts of seven southeastern states including Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia.

Geographic Risks

Concentration risk within the Tennessee Valley region
Regulatory and political risks associated with federal ownership

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape neutral - aligned.
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
37.7NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$24.23Price below (-1.7%)Price below its 50-day average = near-term downtrend.
200-Day Average$24.16Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossGolden50-day above 200-dayA "golden cross" — the medium trend has overtaken the long trend (often read as bullish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (7 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (7)
  • No dividend data. Assuming 3% yield.
  • Shares from unknown — per-share values may be less accurate.
  • Illiquidity discount 25% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Dividend data sparse; DDM using estimated yield. Confidence reduced.
  • Shares/market cap missing or defaulted; per-share valuation unreliable.
  • Shares defaulted to 1; IV is NOT meaningful — treat as data-unavailable.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Tennessee Valley Authority's SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
20251.4B
20241.1B
202312.1B500.0M
202212.5B1.1B
202110.5B1.5B

Cash Flow (5yr)

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
2025 3.3B 4.5B -1.1B
2024 3.0B 3.3B -278.0M
2023 2.9B 2.5B 346.0M
2022 2.9B 2.4B 587.0M
2021 3.3B 2.0B 1.3B

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a TTM dividend, not this single year.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets60.9B
Total Liabilities
Equity
Total Debt22.1B

Similar companies worth a look

Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.

PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $TVC — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $TVC on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.