CXJ GROUP CO., Ltd (ECXJ) Stock Analysis

Price updated 2 days ago · SEC data refreshed 5 days ago ⓘ · Not investment advice

CXJ GROUP CO., Ltd

ECXJ Consumer Cyclical Motor Vehicles📄 SEC filings ↗
Speculative
Long-term trend (200d) 62% below 200-day Risk 40/100 Elevated
▾ What's in the 40/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 59/100 → +18.5
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 50/100 → +12.9
Total40/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $1.30 · 2 days ago 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 5 days ago
📍 START HERE

How to read ECXJ (speculative micro-cap)

No model can pin a precise fair value on a company this small — but that does not mean there is nothing to learn. The useful questions are what the price is betting on, and whether the company can survive long enough to deliver it.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reverse-DCF — what growth the price assumes ↓
    The single most useful number here: it backs out the growth the market is paying for. If that figure is "historically unprecedented," the price is running on hype, not fundamentals.
  2. 2 Cash runway ↓
    A pre-profit micro-cap lives or dies on whether it can fund itself to profitability before running out of money and diluting you.
  3. 3 The raw financial statements + the 10-K ↓
    At this scale, the actual numbers, insider ownership, and share-count trend tell you more than any ratio.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ Using the right valuation lens for this business type

Standard DCF doesn't fit ECXJ well — but that's expected for this kind of business. The Rule of 40 (Pre-Profit Growth) Lens below uses the metrics actually used by analysts who value motor vehicles. Reverse DCF + Football Field also work as cross-checks.

ⓘ Why does ECXJ trade at $1.30?

CXJ GROUP CO., Ltd has 102.3 million shares outstanding. At $1.30 per share, the market values all outstanding ECXJ equity at $133 million. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash (ECXJ carries little or no debt, so the two are close here). The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values ECXJ in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation → economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…
⚠️ BUSINESS-MODEL ADVISORY — SPECULATIVE NANO / MICRO-CAP

How to read a company this small

ECXJ is too small and/or too volatile for the valuation lenses we use on larger, more stable companies. The numbers shown below should be taken as rough orientation only.

✅ What actually drives value for this kind of company
  • Latest annual revenue $532K — too small for meaningful growth percentages
❌ Metrics that DON'T apply (ignore these even if you see them below)

Growth percentages on tiny revenue bases (1000% going from $200K to $2M is not predictive). P/E and ROE swing wildly with small earnings changes. Peer comparisons fail because there often aren't comparable companies at this scale.

📚 Where to actually look

Start with the Reverse-DCF above — it backs out the growth the price is betting on; if that figure is "historically unprecedented," the price is running on hype, not fundamentals. Then the cash runway (can it fund itself to profitability before diluting you?). Then the raw Financials table and the 10-K on SEC EDGAR — at this scale, insider ownership and the share-count trend often matter more than any ratio.

Classified as Speculative Nano / Micro-cap (confidence 80%). Disagree? An admin can override via the post edit screen.

PEER BASKET — LIMITED COMPARABLES

⚠ Genuine comparables are scarce at this size, so peer multiples are unreliable here. Treat as rough context only — see 📍 What to focus on above.

How does ECXJ stack up against its closest peers?

Ideally we compare ECXJ only to same-industry peers, but too few exist in our universe right now, so the basket below mixes in broader-sector names. Treat the multiples as rough context, not a valuation. For a leveraged business, EV/EBIT and FCF yield (both in the table) are usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)
EV / Sales?EV / Sales — For every $1 of yearly revenue, this is how many dollars investors pay to own the whole business (including debt).
Why it matters: Works for pre-profit growth companies where P/E and FCF don't apply. The most apples-to-apples cross-company multiple because it ignores accounting choices.
Reference: 1–3x for mature companies · 4–10x for software/SaaS · 10–20x for hypergrowth · >20x is rare and demanding
Full explanation →		 0.3x / 0.4x / 0.9x
EV / Gross Profit?EV / Gross Profit — Enterprise value divided by gross profit — the multiple paid for what each dollar of sales contributes after direct costs.
Why it matters: More refined than EV/Sales for high-margin businesses (software, marketplaces) where gross margin is the real economic engine.
Reference: 8–15x for SaaS · 15–25x for hypergrowth software · >30x demanding
Full explanation →		 1.5x / 2.0x / 2.8x

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 8 peers (broad — see caveat); implausible multiples excluded.

Peer-implied value check
We're not showing a peer-implied price for ECXJ: with only 3 genuine same-industry comparables, a median built partly from broader-sector names would be misleading. Lean on the DCF above; use the multiples table only as loose context.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (8)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/Sales EV/GPEV/EBIT FCF Yield
LIDR AEye, Inc. Motor Vehicles $93M 397.6x —— 0.5%
SRI STONERIDGE INC Motor Vehicles $211M 0.5x —— 1.3%
MCRP Micropolis AI Robotics Motor Vehicles $80M — —— —
CAAS China Automotive Systems, Inc. Motor Vehicles ·fallback $140M 0.3x 1.5x4.1x 5.7%
INVZ Innoviz Technologies Ltd. Motor Vehicles ·fallback $163M 3.0x 12.7x— 1.3%
CVGI Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Motor Vehicles ·fallback $187M 0.3x 2.8x— 11.3%
MPAA MOTORCAR PARTS OF AMERICA INC Motor Vehicles ·fallback $212M 0.3x 1.4x5.3x 14.4%
KNDI Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. Motor Vehicles ·fallback $69M 0.9x 2.0x— 7.9%
FINANCIAL HEALTH SCREENS

Bankruptcy + quality screens

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
36.46
Safe zone

Safe zone under the classic Altman thresholds — companies scoring here have historically gone bankrupt only rarely within ~2 years. A screening signal, not a guarantee.

The classic Z-score was calibrated on manufacturers. It is less reliable for asset-light or non-manufacturing businesses (broadcasters, media, software, services) and not applicable to banks, REITs, or insurers — for those the coefficients and the asset-turnover term distort the result. Read it as one screening input, not a verdict.

Read with caution for this industry. Automakers (and airlines) run a large captive finance arm, which inflates total assets and liabilities and depresses Altman Z — it routinely reads "distress" even for investment-grade names with full access to capital markets. Treat it as one input, not a literal bankruptcy probability. Weigh it against the company's cash position, near-term debt maturities, and where it sits in the economic cycle.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
6 / 9
Mediocre
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • ✗ Positive net income
    Net income -$0.0M in FY2026.
    Why this matters: Does the company actually earn a profit? Sustained losses eventually force it to raise money — diluting you — or take on debt.
  • ✓ Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $0.1M (was -$0.4M the prior year).
  • ✓ Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $0.1M vs net income -$0.0M.
  • ✓ Return on assets improving
    Return on assets -3.0% vs -760.9% a year ago.
  • ✓ Debt load (vs assets)
    The filing reports no interest-bearing debt in either year (total assets $0.3M).
  • ✗ Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 0.15x vs 0.15x a year ago — below 1.0, a caution flag.
    Why this matters: The current ratio compares assets it can turn to cash within a year against bills due within a year. Below 1.0 means it may struggle to cover near-term obligations.
  • ✓ Share count (dilution)
    Share count held roughly flat (102.1M → 102.3M year-over-year).
  • ✗ Pricing power (gross margin)
    Gross margin 67.0% vs 81.3% a year ago.
    Why this matters: Rising gross margin means stronger pricing power or lower input costs — a sign of competitive strength. Falling margin signals pressure.
  • ✓ Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 1.63x vs 1.53x a year ago.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

INTERACTIVE — TWEAK YOUR ASSUMPTIONS

What if you assume different inputs?

Here's where we land — and what happens if you change the assumptions. Drag the sliders to set your own Discount Rate?Discount Rate — The annual return you demand for taking single-stock risk instead of buying a safe Treasury or index fund.
Why it matters: Higher discount rate = stricter valuation (a stock has to produce more cash to be worth holding). Lower = more generous.
Reference: 8–12% is standard · 9–10% matches S&P 500 historical return · Below 7% is illogical for single-stock risk
Full explanation → (the annual return you demand for single-stock risk) and terminal growth; the value updates live so you can see whether the stock looks cheaper or richer. The discount rate starts at 10.0%, the figure our model used for ECXJ. Open Advanced to also change beta, growth and the rate path.

Note: no headline intrinsic value is published for this stock (the valuation is held for a data-quality reason — see the notes above). The calculator below is a what-if tool: the values it produces are your assumptions played out, not our estimate.

4.5% (risk-free)9-10% normal18% (deep-risk)
0%2-3% (GDP)5% (rarely sustainable)

A full intrinsic value isn't shown for ECXJ because the valuation is currently held for a data-quality reason (see the guardrail notes above). The reverse-DCF reading still works — it needs only the price and cash flow — but we won't publish a forward value until the underlying data passes our checks.

For comparison — the revenue growth today's price already assumes
—
—

—

⚙ Advanced — tinker with every input (beta, growth, rate path, margin → full intrinsic value)
Where the discount rate comes from — discount rate = risk-free + beta × equity-risk-premium
What you'd earn risk-free from government bonds — the floor under every other rate. Slide it down to model the market expecting rate cuts (value rises); up for higher-for-longer.
The extra yearly return investors demand for owning stocks instead of safe bonds — the price of risk. History runs ~4.5–6.5%; we default to 5.5% (slightly conservative). It's an estimate, not a law — lower it if you think equities are less risky than that.
Inflation reduces the purchasing power of a nominal return: a 9% gain at 3% inflation is about 6% in real terms. The intrinsic value above is already in today's dollars (a nominal DCF carries inflation in both the growth and the discount rate), so this switch does not change the value — it restates the return in real terms.
Higher beta → higher discount rate (sets the rate above). 1.0 = moves with the market.
What you think ECXJ can grow revenue for ~5 years, then fades to terminal.
For a pre-profit company: the % of revenue that eventually becomes free cash flow once mature. (Our published value uses the sector norm.)
All inputs start at the values our model used.

    Copy shareable link to this scenario →

    Price$1.30
    Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

    The market appears to be paying for significant future growth, as implied by the 54.1% reverse DCF?Reverse DCF — Instead of asking "what is this stock worth?", asks "what growth rate is the current market price already assuming?"
    Why it matters: It crystallizes the bull thesis as a single number you can argue with. If the market expects 40% growth for 10 years and you do not believe that, the stock is overvalued.
    Reference: 10–15% = sustainable for strong companies · 20–25% = exceptional · 30%+ = historically very rare
    Full explanation →     growth rate, despite the company's declining revenue (-33.8%/yr over 4yr) and negative net income. The market may be assigning value to potential new product lines or market expansion within the Motor Vehicles sector, which is not in the model. The biggest risk to our model's base assumptions is that normalized cash flow continues to decline, given the historical revenue decline from $3M to $1M.

    ⚠️ Cyclical sector: using normalized cash flow (median OCF minus estimated maintenance capex).

    As of 5 days ago

    ANATOMY

    Anatomy of a share

    What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

    ECXJ CXJ GROUP CO., Ltd stock anatomy showing per-share revenue, operating expenses, free cash flow, and debt
    −1.8%
    loss
    Where each $1 of revenue goes
    For every $1 of revenue, ECXJ currently loses 1.8¢ — costs exceed sales. A money-losing business can still be a good investment if losses are shrinking toward profitability; check the trend, not just the snapshot.
    Net margin = net income ÷ revenue (most recent fiscal year).
    Plain English: each share (at $1) represents $0.01 of revenue per share per year, $0.00 lost per share per year, and $0.00 of free cash flow per share from the latest fiscal year. The filing reports no interest-bearing debt — the 2.0M of total liabilities on the balance sheet are operating items (payables, leases, deferred taxes), not borrowings.
    What's free cash flow / what do these mean?

    Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.

    Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.

    Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.

    Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.

    THE KEY DEBATE

    What you actually need to decide

    Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

    🐂 The Bull Case
    For the bull case, the company's gross margin expanding from 62.5% to 67% must translate into positive and growing net income, while operating cash flow, which was positive in the latest period, must stabilize and grow around the modeled business rate.
    🐻 The Bear Case
    The bear case centers on the continuation of the revenue decline (-33.8%/yr over 4yr) and persistent negative net income, which would make the market's implied 54.1% annual per-share cash flow growth unsustainable. The current ratio of 0.15 also poses a significant liquidity risk.
    📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
    • Reversal of the revenue decline trend
    • Consistent positive net income generation
    • Improvement in the current ratio above 1
    MOMENTUM — WHAT'S GETTING BETTER & WORSE

    The trend, in plain numbers (FY2025 → FY2026, latest reported)

    Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

    ✅ Improving
    • Revenue grew +16% to $532K.
    • Free cash flow turned positive at $76K.
    • Still unprofitable at -$10K — loss narrowing.
    ⚠ Worsening
    • Gross margin shrank to 67% (-14 pts).
    WHO

    Management & Leadership

    Limited executive data available. CXJ Group Co., Ltd. operates in the Motor Vehicles industry, but specific executive details are not widely publicized for this entity.

    WHAT

    What They Make

    CXJ Group Co., Ltd. operates in the Motor Vehicles industry. While specific product details are not provided, companies in this sector typically manufacture or distribute vehicles and related components, with paying customers being dealerships, consumers, or other businesses.

    End Markets

    Automotive manufacturingVehicle distributionAutomotive components

    Revenue Drivers

    Vehicle sales
    Parts sales
    Aftermarket services
    Market Cap: 133.0MBeta: 1.15
    WHY

    Why Is It Priced Like This?

    Why Customers Pay

    Transportation solutions
    Personal mobility
    Commercial fleet operations
    No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer We aren't publishing a discounted-cash-flow value here: the model's output failed our plausibility checks, so showing it would imply more precision than we have.

    What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

    The market prices ECXJ at a premium of +992.4%, implying a significant 54.1% annual per-share cash flow growth, despite the company's revenue declining by -33.8%/yr over four years and net income being negative in the latest period. This suggests investors are anticipating a substantial turnaround or new venture, potentially overlooking the current ratio of 0.15, which indicates current liabilities exceed liquid assets.

    HOW

    Business Model & Valuation

    How They Make Money

    Vehicle sales to consumers
    Sales to dealerships
    Aftermarket parts and service

    Not available from current data sources regarding dividends or buybacks; the company's current ratio of 0.15 suggests a focus on managing current liabilities.

    Normalized FCF

    Cyclical/commodity sector (Motor Vehicles): normalized FCF uses 5-year median to smooth peak/trough distortions.

    Show advanced inputs
    Revenue Growth-33.8%
    Sector Default8.0%
    Sector Default SourceConsumer Cyclical sector default
    Best Estimate8.0%
    Methodsector_default
    Growth Basistotal

    What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project its revenue segments independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

    WHEN

    Maturity & Competitive Position

    Mature cash-generating business

    Moat Signals

    Brand recognition (if applicable)
    Distribution network
    Manufacturing expertise

    Revenue has been declining at -33.8%/yr over the last four years, from $3M to $1M.

    WHERE

    Geography & Markets

    Not available from current data sources. Companies in the Motor Vehicles industry typically operate in regional or global markets, depending on their scale and product offerings.

    Geographic Risks

    Geographic concentration risk (if applicable)
    Intense competition in the motor vehicles industry
    SIGNALS

    Market Signals

    These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

    Model bearish, tape neutral
    RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
    Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
    Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
    Full explanation →     (14)    57.2NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
    MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
    Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
    Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
    Full explanation →    BullishLine above signalThe fast trend is above the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently upward.
    50-Day Average$0.57Price above (+128.1%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
    200-Day Average$3.43Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
    50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

    Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

    QUALITY

    Data Quality & Risk Flags (8 notes — click to expand/collapse)
    Guardrail Notes (6)
    • Median OCF is negative — OCF-based normalization not applicable.
    • Normalized OCF-capex was negative. Falling back to median raw FCF.
    • No positive normalized FCF. Using EPS as proxy.
    • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
    • Illiquidity discount 15% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
    • Extreme valuation gap (P/IV withheld — see the note above): result may be dominated by model assumptions, share count issues, or sector-specific dynamics. Treat as low confidence.
    FINANCIALS

    Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

    From CXJ GROUP CO., Ltd's SEC filings (EDGAR).

    Income (5yr)

    YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
    2026531,606-9,680$0.00
    2025458,632-2.3M$-0.02
    20242.3M-2.1M$-0.02
    20232.1M-1.1M$-0.01
    20222.8M-541,453$-0.01

    Cash Flow (5yr)

    Capital expenditure isn't tagged in this filer's machine-readable data (the CapEx column shows "—"). The free-cash-flow column is therefore operating cash flow less stock-based compensation only — an upper bound on true owner earnings, not the real figure. Companies that report capex under a custom label (some large IFRS filers do) look better here than they are.

    YearOperating CFCapEx− SBCFree Cash Flow
    2026 76,483 — — 76,483
    2025 -418,525 — — -418,525
    2024 -590,038 2,934 — -592,972
    2023 -378,815 4,429 — -383,244
    2022 443,523 1,914 — 441,609

    How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a mid-cycle estimate (median operating cash flow less estimated maintenance capex and stock compensation — by design NOT the table's FCF, which deducts every year's full capex), not this single year.

    Balance Sheet

    Total Assets326,441
    Total Liabilities2.0M
    Equity-1.6M
    YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

    Similar companies worth a look

    Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.

    PG
    Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
    ⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed 5 days ago (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
    ← Browse Stocks See sector peers →
    🔔 Follow $ECXJ — free insider alerts
    One email when an insider buys $ECXJ on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.