TORONTO DOMINION BANK (TD) Stock Analysis

Price updated yesterday · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

TORONTO DOMINION BANK

TD Financial Services Banks📄 SEC filings ↗ CUSIP 89114TZJ4
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 47/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (55%) 45/100 → +24.8
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (45%) 50/100 → +22.5
Total47/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $121.47 · yesterday 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read TD (bank / insurer)

Banks and insurers are valued on what they earn on their capital, not on free cash flow — a normal DCF misleads here.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Bank / Insurance lens (P/TBV + ROE) ↓
    Price-to-tangible-book versus return-on-equity is how analysts actually judge a bank cheap or rich.
  2. 2 Financial-health screens ↓
    Watch the trend in profitability and asset quality, not the (not-applicable) bankruptcy score.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ TD is a thinly-disclosed company trading over-the-counter

It files little or nothing with the SEC — so our cash-flow models, financial statements, and U.S. insider data (Form 4) don't apply. What's still real: the live U.S. price and short positioning. Here's what we could pull from other sources:

The Toronto-Dominion Bank, together with its subsidiaries, provides financial and banking services in North America and internationally. The company operates through Canadian Retail, U.S. Retail, and Wholesale Banking segments. The Canadian Retail segment offers various financial products and services, as well as telephone, Internet, and …

📑 Read the real filings: latest SEC 6-K ↗

Identity, share count and tier from FINRA + OTC Markets; not a substitute for the home-market financial statements. Thin U.S. disclosure + OTC trading is itself a risk factor.

ⓘ Why does TD trade at $121.47?

TORONTO DOMINION BANK's reported share count (1.69 billion) appears to be the home-market figure rather than the U.S.-listed share base, so we don't display a market capitalization computed from it — the result would be implausible. Treat per-share aggregates for this filer with caution until the share data reconciles. The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values TD in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

How does TD stack up against its closest peers?

We take the 7 same-industry companies most similar to TD (similar size) and check what investors are paying for each dollar of their revenue (or profits). If TD is much more expensive on the same yardstick, that's a red flag — unless you have a specific reason it deserves a premium. For a leveraged business, FCF yield (in the table) is usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 7 same-industry peers; implausible multiples excluded.

Peer-implied value check
Banks & insurers aren't valued on revenue or EV/Sales — a bank's "revenue" (net interest income + fees) isn't comparable the way a normal company's sales are. Use the Bank lens (P/TBV + ROE) above, which is how banks are actually judged cheap or rich.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (7)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/EBIT FCF Yield
SCDL UBS AG Banks $210.8B 1.7%
UBS UBS Group AG Banks $178.6B 4.4%
USML UBS AG Banks $177.7B 2.0%
BNY Bank of New York Mellon Corp Banks $95.7B 5.6%
SMFG SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP, I Banks $85.3B
VYLD JPMORGAN CHASE & CO Banks $77.9B 70.5%
WF WOORI FINANCIAL GROUP INC. Banks $51.3B 4.2%

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not Applicable

Altman Z was calibrated on industrial firms and doesn't apply to banks or insurers — their balance sheets are dominated by loans/securities, not working capital. See the Bank Valuation Lens above for P/B, ROE and ROA — the metrics regulators and analysts actually use to assess bank solvency.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
Not Applicable

Piotroski F was built for non-financial firms (gross margin, asset turnover, current ratio all assume an industrial cost structure). For banks, the equivalent quality signals are efficiency ratio, net interest margin, and provision coverage — see the Bank Valuation Lens above.

Price$121.47
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
valuation is not meaningful for TD Bank because the model implies no positive equity value under its assumptions, as indicated by the 'INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive' flag. Investors are likely focused on the bank's consistent earnings, dividend stability, and overall financial sector performance rather than speculative future cash flows. The primary quantifiable risk is its low franchise/durability score of 0/5, suggesting potential competitive vulnerabilities.

⚠️ Financial sector: using residual income model. IV = Book Value + PV(excess earnings).

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
The stock could work if TD continues to demonstrate consistent earnings growth and maintains its dividend, leveraging its strong market position in North America.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest fundamental risk is the 'Franchise/durability score 0/5', implying that without a strong competitive moat, the bank could face increasing pressure on margins or market share from competitors.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Quarterly net interest margin trends
  • Loan growth rates in key segments
  • Regulatory changes impacting financial institutions

Management & Leadership

Bharat Masrani has served as the Group President and Chief Executive Officer of TD Bank Group since November 2014, leading one of North America's largest banks. He oversees the bank's strategic direction and operations across its diverse business segments.

Bharat Masrani
Group President and Chief Executive Officer
Ajai Bambawale
Group Head and Chief Risk Officer
Kelvin Tran
Group Head and Chief Financial Officer

What They Make

TD Bank provides a wide range of financial products and services, including retail banking, wealth management, and wholesale banking, primarily serving individual consumers, small businesses, and corporations.

End Markets

Retail BankingWealth ManagementWholesale Banking

Revenue Drivers

Net Interest Income
Service Charges and Fees
Trading Revenue
Market Cap: 205.2BBeta: 0.83

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Extensive branch network and ATM access
Comprehensive digital banking platforms
Diverse product offerings for various financial needs
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer No machine-readable cash-flow statement in this filer's EDGAR submissions — common for foreign private issuers (20-F/6-K). That makes a discounted-cash-flow valuation impossible: there is no free cash flow to discount. It does not affect the income-statement or balance-sheet figures below.

The income statement and balance sheet are also too incomplete here to substitute another lens honestly, so this page carries price, momentum and disclosure facts only.

The market prices TD based on its status as a large, established financial institution with stable earnings and a history of dividends, rather than a growth stock where future cash flows are highly uncertain. The 'residual_income' model is used, reflecting that for banks, valuation often ties to book value and excess earnings, especially given the 'Franchise/durability score 0/5' which suggests limited competitive advantage for a typical DCF?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Net Interest Income
Service Charges and Fees
Trading Revenue

Residual Income

Balance-sheet financial (Banks): residual income model - book value is meaningful anchor.

Show advanced inputs
Sector Default8.0%

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project net interest income and fee-income lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Financial institution

Moat Signals

Large customer deposit base
Extensive branch and ATM network
Brand recognition and trust

Revenue and EPS?EPS — Earnings per share — net income divided by shares outstanding.
Why it matters: The basis for the P/E ratio. But "earnings" is an accountant's figure — easier to manipulate than cash flow.
Full explanation →
trends are generally stable for this mature financial institution.

Geography & Markets

TD Bank operates primarily in North America, with significant retail banking presence in Canada and the Eastern United States. Specific geographic mix percentages are not available in the current data.

Geographic Risks

Concentration in North American banking markets
Interest rate fluctuation risk

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape bullish
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
73.4OverboughtBought up hard recently — stretched; pullbacks are common from here.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BullishLine above signalThe fast trend is above the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently upward.
50-Day Average$103.36Price above (+17.5%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
200-Day Average$90.63Price aboveThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossGolden50-day above 200-dayA "golden cross" — the medium trend has overtaken the long trend (often read as bullish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (5 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (5)
  • Financial sector: using residual income model. IV = Book Value + PV(excess earnings).
  • INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive. Model may not be appropriate.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Model mismatch: residual income inappropriate for asset-light financial (BVPS $0.00 not meaningful vs price $114). Consider FCF model.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From TORONTO DOMINION BANK's SEC filings (EDGAR).

Similar companies worth a look

Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.

PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $TD — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $TD on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.