Is Bluerock Acquisition Corp. (BLRK) a good stock to buy?

Price through Oct 9 market close · SEC data refreshed 6 days ago ⓘ · Not investment advice
Bluerock Acquisition Corp.
BLRK Financial Services SPACs📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
Mixed ●●●●●

Our tested checks disagree with each other, so the answer depends on something further down the page rather than on any one measure.

What each rating means, in numbers

Can it survive? — Middling. Safer than 37% of the companies we cover, judged on the warning signs that came before companies that really did fail.

What "tested" means here, and why there is no score out of 100

Tested means the read was measured against what actually happened afterwards, on a history that keeps the companies that were later delisted, using only figures that had been filed on the day they are used. Survival was ranked on companies that really did fail. What an owner keeps was tested across the universe from 2011 to 2025.

The full record of everything we have tested is on the research pages.

Which benchmark. Over the period we tested, the median listed company returned +5.8% a year while the S&P 500 returned about +13.9% — the index is weighted by size and was carried by a handful of enormous winners. So "beats the index" and "beats the other companies you could have bought" are different questions. Where a read says it picks better companies, it means the second one. None of these gets you an index fund's return, and we would rather say that than imply otherwise.

The quality read is the strongest thing we have tested: 131,000 company-quarters across 5,300 companies, where the weakest scorers went on to fail at 5.4% against 1.4% for the strongest, holding in every era and all twelve sectors. It still says less likely to break, not likely to beat the market — every band in that study lost to the index at the median, because the median listed company does.

Each read is shown on its own rather than merged into a single score, so you can see which part is strong and which is weak instead of taking an average on trust.

▾ What goes into the smart-money reading
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (50%) 45/100 → +22.5
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (50%) 30/100 → +15.0
Total38/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $10.13 · through Oct 9 market close 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 6 days ago
Business type SPAC / shell ⓘ Blank-check / shell entity — no operating business yet
8%
vs 14% normally
Low
The market, not this company tested

Chance the S&P 500 falls 10% or more in the next three months.

Counted from every day since 2006. Says nothing about BLRK — see the board for how it is measured.

📍 Where to start on this page, and what to look at first

How to read BLRK (pre-profit growth)

This company is reinvesting instead of generating profit, so a standard DCF cannot price it. The useful question is whether the growth the market is paying for is achievable — and whether the company can fund itself until then.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reverse-DCF — the growth the price demands ↓
    It shows exactly how fast the business must grow to justify today's price. Compare that to what comparable companies have actually achieved.
  2. 2 Cash runway ↓
    Can it reach profitability before it has to raise money and dilute shareholders?
  3. 3 Interactive calculator ↓
    Set your own growth + margin assumptions and see what the business would be worth if you are right.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ BLRK is a thinly-disclosed company trading over-the-counter

It files little or nothing with the SEC — so our cash-flow models, financial statements, and U.S. insider data (Form 4) don't apply. What's still real: the live U.S. price and short positioning. Here's what we could pull from other sources:

Bluerock Acquisition Corp. is a blank check company incorporated as a Cayman Islands exempted company and incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, amalgamation, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities.

Disclosure tierNo Tier Market cap$175M Shares out17.3M
Shell company

📑 Read the real filings: latest SEC 10-Q ↗

Identity, share count and tier from FINRA + OTC Markets; not a substitute for the home-market financial statements. Thin U.S. disclosure + OTC trading is itself a risk factor.

Loading insider & short-seller data…

Riskier than 63% of the stocks we cover

Failure risk
Middling
●●●●●
Rank 63 of 100
Went bankrupt within a year
0.2%
●●●●●
Average company: 0.6%
What this rating means, and what it does not

What this rank is — Middling. Riskier than 63% of the companies we cover. Out of every 100 companies ranked here, about 0.2% went bankrupt within the year, against 0.6% for the average company we cover. The rank comes from a model trained on every US filing since 2012, including 823 companies that really did fail, and scored each year by a version that had not seen that year.

What it is not — Not a trade. We tested shorting these names and buying puts, spreads, straddles and condors on them at real option prices, 2010-2025. Every version lost money: the market already prices the distress and the survivors squeeze. A high rank is a reason to read the filings and to size for a total loss, not a reason to bet against the company. A low rank says the balance sheet is calm, not that the price is sensible.

▾ The numbers, the logic, and why not to trade on it

The logic. A model trained on every US filing since 2012 — including 823 companies that went bankrupt or stopped trading under a dollar — ranks each covered stock by its chance of failing in the next year, from its latest filing, price history and credit conditions. The rank is a position among peers; the table is a count of what happened to stocks in each position, scored each year by a model that had not seen that year.

Rank band went bankrupt within 12 monthsfell 80% or more (or failed) within 12 monthsfell 50% or more (or failed) within 6 months
All covered stocks (average) 0.59% 4.21% 8.51%
Finance (sector average) 0.13% 1.25% 3.09%
riskiest 1% 16.4% 33.0% 45.5%
next 2% (97-99) 5.9% 24.9% 38.2%
next 2% (95-97) 3.4% 21.2% 33.8%
next 5% (90-95) 1.6% 15.1% 27.3%
next 15% (75-90) 0.8% 8.5% 17.8%
next 25% (50-75) ← this stock 0.2% 2.7% 6.2%
safest half <0.1% 0.5% 2.1%

Why not to trade on it. We tested shorting these names and buying puts, spreads, straddles and condors on them at real option prices, 2010–2025: every version lost money. The market already prices the distress, and the survivors squeeze. Use a high rank to read the filings and to size for a total loss — not to bet against the company. A low rank says the balance sheet is calm, not that the price is sensible.

Scored from the most recent SEC filing we had (dated 2026-05-15), which can be a quarterly report newer than the yearly figures used elsewhere on this page; scores last updated 2026-09-18. Within Finance: rank 79 of 100. Rough one-year odds for this stock alone: bankruptcy 0.1%, an 80% fall 0.5% (the model overstates the middle of the range).

Takeover odds: higher than 98% of the stocks we cover. Companies ranked here were acquired within a year 10.3% of the time (average 4.6%).
▾ The logic, and why not to buy on it

The logic. Trained on 2,900 acquisitions since 2012, the model leans on size (small), age, retained earnings, asset growth, volatility and how many deals the sector has just seen. Announcement = the day the stock jumped, not the day the paperwork was filed.

top 1% 15.4% acquired within a year
next 2% (97-99) ← this stock 10.3% acquired within a year
next 2% (95-97) 9.0% acquired within a year
next 5% (90-95) 7.3% acquired within a year
next 15% (75-90) 6.4% acquired within a year
next 25% (50-75) 4.8% acquired within a year
bottom half 3.0% acquired within a year

Why not to buy on it. A takeover paid a median +22% on the day — but even in the top band about 6 in 7 companies are not bought, and those lag. Buying the whole top list returned what the S&P 500 did (2012–2023), and adding "cheap" or "beaten-down" filters did not change that. Read it as context for a thesis you already have, never as the thesis.

Checking filings for failure warnings…

How to read a company this small

This is a SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) or blank-check entity. There's no operating business yet — it's a pool of cash looking for a target to merge with.

✅ What actually drives value for this kind of company
  • Cash in trust per share — typically $10.00 at IPO, slowly accrues interest
  • Sponsor reputation and track record
  • Time remaining to find a target (usually 18-24 months)
  • Announced target (if any) and the proposed deal structure
  • Warrant terms — usually 1/2 to 1/4 warrant per share at $11.50 strike
❌ Metrics that DON'T apply (ignore these even if you see them below)

All operating metrics — there are no operations. Revenue, FCF, EBITDA are all near zero or sponsor expenses.

📚 Where to actually look

SEC filings for the S-1 prospectus. Recent 8-K filings for target announcements. SPACInsider for sponsor track records.

Classified as SPAC / Blank-Check Company (confidence 95%). Disagree? An admin can override via the post edit screen.

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The F-score compares two consecutive years of income, cash-flow and balance-sheet data. We have 0 years of income data for this filer, but no machine-readable cash-flow statement — so several of the nine checks have no input at all. We show nothing rather than score a partial year against itself. The reported figures in the financial tables below are unaffected.

Price$10.13
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Bluerock Acquisition Corp. because the model projects negative free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
, indicating it is not yet generating profits. Valuing this company would require a detailed understanding of its future acquisition targets and their potential for revenue growth and profitability. Investors are likely betting on the successful identification and acquisition of a high-growth private company. The biggest risk to our assumptions is that the model implies no positive equity value, suggesting the underlying business assumptions may be overly optimistic or that the company's current structure does not support a traditional valuation.

⚠️ FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.

As of 6 days ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
The most important operating factor for Bluerock Acquisition Corp. is the successful identification and completion of a business combination with a high-quality, high-growth private company, which would then generate future revenue and cash flow.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest operating risk is the failure to identify and complete a suitable business combination within the mandated timeframe, leading to liquidation and a return of capital to shareholders, potentially below the initial investment amount.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Announcement of a definitive agreement for a business combination
  • Shareholder vote on a proposed merger
  • Completion of the de-SPAC transaction

Management & Leadership

Ramin Kamfar R. serves as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, with Christopher J. Vohs as the Chief Financial Officer. Other key executives include Simon K Adamiyatt and Ryan S Macdonald, both Executive Vice Presidents, and Jordan B. Ruddy as President.

Ramin Kamfar R.
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) (per SEC 10-Q Ex.31 certification, 2026-08-11)

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

Christopher J. Vohs
Chief Financial Officer (per SEC Form 3, 2025-12-10)

Chief Financial Officer

Simon K Adamiyatt
Executive Vice President (per SEC Form 3, 2025-12-10)
Ryan S Macdonald
Executive Vice President (per SEC Form 3, 2025-12-10)
Jordan B. Ruddy
President (per SEC Form 3, 2025-12-10)

What They Make

Bluerock Acquisition Corp. is a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) formed to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses. The company's direct payers are investors who purchase its shares, anticipating a future business combination.

End Markets

Private companies seeking public listingInvestment communityCapital markets

Revenue Drivers

Successful business combination
Investor capital contributions
Sponsor investments
Beta: 0.55

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Alternative path to public markets for private companies
Investment opportunity in de-SPAC transactions
Access to capital for target companies
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer No machine-readable cash-flow statement in this filer's EDGAR submissions — common for foreign private issuers (20-F/6-K). That makes a discounted-cash-flow valuation impossible: there is no free cash flow to discount. It does not affect the income-statement or balance-sheet figures below.

What we use instead: book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market is pricing Bluerock Acquisition Corp. based on expectations of a successful future business combination, rather than current cash flow, as the model projects negative free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
. The market may be assigning value to the optionality of identifying and acquiring a high-growth private company, which is not in the model. This optionality may or may not materialize, depending on the quality of the eventual target and the terms of the merger.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Identifying and acquiring a target company
Raising capital through public offerings
Sponsor investments and warrants

The company funds itself primarily through equity raises from its initial public offering and subsequent capital contributions, as it is in an acquisition phase and not generating operating cash flow.

Growth / Revenue DCF

No cash flow statement data available - using revenue/margin growth model as fallback.

Show advanced inputs
Revenue Growth15.0%

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings cash-flow model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project net interest income and fee-income lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Growth / re-investment phase

Moat Signals

Experienced management team in SPACs
Access to capital markets
Network of potential target companies

Geography & Markets

Bluerock Acquisition Corp. is US-headquartered, and its operations are primarily focused on identifying acquisition targets within the United States, though exact geographic segment split is not in current filings.

Geographic Risks

Regulatory changes impacting SPACs in the US
Competition for attractive acquisition targets

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape neutral - aligned.
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
65.8NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$10.09Price above (+0.4%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (9 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (9)
  • FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.
  • INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive. Model may not be appropriate.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Shares from unknown — per-share values may be less accurate.
  • Illiquidity discount 25% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Shares/market cap missing or defaulted; per-share valuation unreliable.
  • Shares defaulted to 1; IV is NOT meaningful — treat as data-unavailable.
  • VALUATION HELD (MISSING_SHARE_COUNT): per-share values suppressed due to shares/market cap missing or unreliable.
  • Extreme valuation gap (P/IV withheld — see the note above): result may be dominated by model assumptions, share count issues, or sector-specific dynamics. Treat as low confidence.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Bluerock Acquisition Corp.'s SEC filings (EDGAR).

Balance Sheet

Total Assets173.6M
Total Liabilities7.4M
Equity-6.6M
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →

The questions people ask about BLRK

Is Bluerock Acquisition Corp. (BLRK) a good stock to buy?

We do not publish a single fair value for Bluerock Acquisition Corp., because one number would not be reliable for this business (the page explains why). Judge it on what today's price assumes, its financial-health checks and what insiders are doing, all shown here from SEC filings. This is educational research from SEC filings, not investment advice.

Is Bluerock Acquisition Corp. (BLRK) overvalued?

A single fair-value number is not reliable for Bluerock Acquisition Corp., so we do not call it overvalued or undervalued. The page shows what growth today's price assumes and how the company's finances look instead. This is educational research from SEC filings, not investment advice.

Where do these numbers come from?

From Bluerock Acquisition Corp.'s own SEC filings (10-K and 10-Q), Form 4 insider filings and daily market prices. Every figure on the page links to how it was calculated, and the model's weak spots are listed next to its results.

⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed 6 days ago (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $BLRK — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $BLRK on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.