Contango Silver & Gold Inc. (CTGO) Stock Analysis

Price updated 4 days ago · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

Contango Silver & Gold Inc.

CTGO Basic Materials Gold & Silver Mining📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 37/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 65/100 → +20.4
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 33/100 → +8.5
Total37/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $18.31 · 4 days ago 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read CTGO (cyclical commodity producer)

A miner or energy producer earns whatever the commodity price is, so a single DCF swings with the cycle. Judge it against peers and where you think the commodity cycle is heading.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 EV/Sales peer comparison ↓
    How the price compares to similar producers is more meaningful than a through-cycle DCF.
  2. 2 Interactive calculator (test cycle assumptions) ↓
    Flex the growth/discount inputs to see how sensitive the value is to where we are in the cycle.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ Using the right valuation lens for this business type

Standard DCF doesn't fit CTGO well — but that's expected for this kind of business. The EV/Sales Peer Comparison below uses the metrics actually used by analysts who value gold & silver mining. Reverse DCF + Football Field also work as cross-checks.

ⓘ Why a standard DCF doesn't settle this one — CTGO is a cyclical commodity producer

Miners, metals and energy producers earn whatever the commodity price is at the time. A discounted-cash-flow model leans on recent cash flow, so it swings with the cycle: the result is dominated by where we are in the commodity cycle rather than by durable business economics.

For this business type, lean on the EV/Sales peer comparison and Reverse-DCF below (how today's price compares to similar producers and what growth it implies), and weigh the commodity-price outlook. Treat the DCF number as a rough mid-cycle reference, not a buy/sell trigger.

ⓘ Why does CTGO trade at $18.31?

Contango Silver & Gold Inc. has 12.9 million shares outstanding. At $18.31 per share, the market values all outstanding CTGO equity at $236 million. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash — and it matters here because CTGO carries substantial debt. The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values CTGO in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

How does CTGO stack up against its closest peers?

We take the 8 same-industry companies most similar to CTGO (similar size) and check what investors are paying for each dollar of their revenue (or profits). If CTGO is much more expensive on the same yardstick, that's a red flag — unless you have a specific reason it deserves a premium. For a leveraged business, FCF yield (in the table) is usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)
EV / Gross Profit?EV / Gross Profit — Enterprise value divided by gross profit — the multiple paid for what each dollar of sales contributes after direct costs.
Why it matters: More refined than EV/Sales for high-margin businesses (software, marketplaces) where gross margin is the real economic engine.
Reference: 8–15x for SaaS · 15–25x for hypergrowth software · >30x demanding
Full explanation →
8.4x / 9.7x / 31.0x

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 8 same-industry peers; implausible multiples excluded.

Peer-implied value check
Revenue/share data missing for CTGO — can't compute a peer-implied price. The multiples table above still works as context.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (8)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/Sales EV/GPEV/EBIT FCF Yield
TRX TRX GOLD Corp Gold & Silver Mining $232M 4.0x 9.7x 2.6%
GORO GOLD RESOURCE CORP Gold & Silver Mining $225M 2.3x 8.4x 3.0%
GLDG GoldMining Inc. Gold & Silver Mining $250M
TII Titan Mining Corp Gold & Silver Mining $214M
VGZ VISTA GOLD CORP Gold & Silver Mining $270M 0.5%
PLG PLATINUM GROUP METALS LTD Gold & Silver Mining $197M
SBMT SILVER BOW MINING CORP. Gold & Silver Mining $295M
VOXR VOX ROYALTY CORP. Gold & Silver Mining $312M 25.9x 31.0x 1.2%

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski-style checks (partial — not a standard F-score)
5 passed · 2 failed · 2 n/a
Partial result, not a standard F-score: 5 of 7 measurable checks passed. 2 of the 9 standard checks couldn't be measured, so this is scored out of 7, not 9 — it isn't comparable to a published F-score.
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income -$36.1M in FY2025.
    Why this matters: Does the company actually earn a profit? Sustained losses eventually force it to raise money — diluting you — or take on debt.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $25.7M (was $0.7M the prior year).
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $25.7M vs net income -$36.1M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets -21.0% vs -28.4% a year ago.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    Long-term debt is 19.7% of assets vs 51.5% a year ago ($33.9M of $172.0M assets).
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 0.90x vs 0.29x a year ago — improved, but still below 1.0: the ✓ grades the trend, the level remains a caution flag.
  • Share count (dilution)
    Share count rose 18.4% (10.9M → 12.9M year-over-year).
    Why this matters: Issuing lots of new shares splits the pie into more pieces, shrinking your slice. Stable or falling share count protects existing owners.
  • · Pricing power (gross margin) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • · Sales per asset (asset turnover) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

Price$18.31
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
valuation is not meaningful for Contango Silver & Gold Inc. because its net income is negative and its operating cash flow has been erratic, making consistent cash flow projections unreliable. Investors are likely focused on the company's ability to achieve consistent positive operating cash flow and its long-term debt reduction. The #1 quantifiable risk is its current ratio of 0.9, indicating current liabilities exceed liquid assets.

⚠️ Cyclical sector: using normalized cash flow (median OCF minus estimated maintenance capex).

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

CTGO Contango Silver & Gold Inc. stock anatomy showing per-share revenue, operating expenses, free cash flow, and debt
What's free cash flow / what do these mean?

Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.

Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.

Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.

Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
Operating cash flow must consistently turn positive from its current erratic state, demonstrating the company's ability to self-fund its operations and growth.
🐻 The Bear Case
The current ratio of 0.9, where current liabilities exceed liquid assets, implies ongoing liquidity challenges if not addressed, potentially requiring further dilutive financing.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Consistent positive operating cash flow in upcoming quarters
  • Improvement in the current ratio above 1.0
  • Announcements of increased production volumes

The trend, in plain numbers (FY2024 → FY2025, latest reported)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

✅ Improving
  • Free cash flow turned positive at $22.4M.
  • Still unprofitable at -$36.1M — loss narrowing.

Nothing was clearly worsening year-over-year.

Management & Leadership

Contango Silver & Gold Inc. is led by its current CEO, Brad Juneau, who has been instrumental in guiding the company through its operational phases. As a mining company, executive leadership focuses on resource development and operational efficiency. Limited executive data available.

Clark Michael Aaron
CFO — per latest SEC filing (2026-08-19)
Van Nieuwenhuyse Rick
CEO — per latest SEC filing (2026-06-26)

Names marked "per latest SEC filing" come from Form 4 / Item 408 filings and take precedence over our AI-compiled roster when they differ.

What They Make

Contango Silver & Gold Inc. is a natural resource company primarily engaged in the exploration, development, and production of silver and gold properties. Its customers are typically refiners and metal traders in the precious metals market.

End Markets

Precious Metals MarketIndustrial Silver DemandInvestment Gold Demand

Revenue Drivers

Silver production volume
Gold production volume
Commodity prices
CEO: Van Nieuwenhuyse RickMarket Cap: 236.2MBeta: 1.63

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Supply of physical silver
Supply of physical gold
Diversification for investors
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer We aren't publishing a discounted-cash-flow value here: the model's output failed our plausibility checks, so showing it would imply more precision than we have.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market's pricing for Contango Silver & Gold Inc. is driven by expectations of future commodity price movements and the company's ability to transition to consistent profitability, given its negative net income. Investors are likely betting on the optionality provided by its mining assets and the potential for increased operating cash flow, which has been positive in 2 of the last 5 years.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Silver production volume
Gold production volume
Commodity prices

Normalized FCF

Cyclical/commodity sector (Gold & Silver Mining): normalized FCF uses 5-year median to smooth peak/trough distortions.

Show advanced inputs
Sector Default5.0%
Best Estimate5.0%
Methodsector_default
Growth Basistotal

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project production volumes, realized commodity prices and unit cash costs independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Cyclical / commodity-linked producer

Moat Signals

Geographic concentration of mineral rights
Operational efficiency in extraction
Access to capital for development

Net income has been negative in the latest period and in 4 out of the last 4 years.

Geography & Markets

Contango Silver & Gold Inc. operates primarily in North America, focusing on its key mining properties. Exact geographic segment splits are not available in current filings.

Geographic Risks

Commodity price volatility risk
Regulatory and environmental risk

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape bearish
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
39.7NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$21.66Price below (-15.5%)Price below its 50-day average = near-term downtrend.
200-Day Average$24.32Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (8 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (8)
  • Cyclical sector: using normalized cash flow (median OCF minus estimated maintenance capex).
  • Median OCF is negative — OCF-based normalization not applicable.
  • Normalized OCF-capex was negative. Falling back to median raw FCF.
  • No positive normalized FCF. Using EPS as proxy.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Illiquidity discount 7% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Extreme valuation (P/IV withheld — see the note above); output dominated by data/units issue (often a multi-class share-count mismatch). Suppressed.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Contango Silver & Gold Inc.'s SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
2025-36.1M$-2.80
2024-38.0M$-3.49
2023-59.1M$-7.14
2022-23.5M$-3.49

Cash Flow (5yr)

Capital expenditure isn't tagged in this filer's machine-readable data (the CapEx column shows "—"). The free-cash-flow column is therefore operating cash flow less stock-based compensation only — an upper bound on true owner earnings, not the real figure. Companies that report capex under a custom label (some large IFRS filers do) look better here than they are.

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
2025 25.7M 3.4M 22.4M
2024 698,987 2.6M -1.9M
2023 -13.6M 3.0M -16.5M
2022 -13.9M 43,989 4.0M -18.0M
2021 36,531 -36,531

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: 25.7M − — − 3.4M (SBC & adj.) = 22.4M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a mid-cycle estimate (median operating cash flow less estimated maintenance capex and stock compensation — by design NOT the table's FCF, which deducts every year's full capex), not this single year.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets172.0M
Total Liabilities146.9M
Equity25.1M
Total Debt33.9M

Similar companies worth a look

Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.

PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $CTGO — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $CTGO on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.