High Templar Tech Ltd (HTT) Stock Analysis

Price updated 4 days ago · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

High Templar Tech Ltd

HTT Financial Services Financial Services📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 39/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100 · Altman Z not scored — input unavailable (see Financial Health)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 57/100 → +17.9
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 50/100 → +12.9
Total39/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). It excludes the Altman Z score, whose retained-earnings input this filer does not report separately. See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $2.50 · 4 days ago 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read HTT

We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reported earnings & margins ↓
    What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
  2. 2 Balance sheet & book value ↓
    Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
  3. 3 Who's selling & betting against it ↓
    Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ A share-count quirk blocked the per-share math

The share count we read for HTT looks wrong — common for multi-class / founder-controlled filers that report shares per share-class. That makes per-share figures (including intrinsic value) misleading, so we suppressed them. The company's total financials below are sound.

What to use instead: Lean on the totals — revenue, net income, cash flow — and the balance sheet. Multi-class share counts are being corrected; once fixed, the per-share valuation returns automatically.

This note is only about the single DCF fair-value number — HTT's full financial statements, health scores, and written analysis are all below.

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski-style checks (partial — not a standard F-score)
4 passed · 3 failed · 2 n/a
Partial result, not a standard F-score: 4 of 7 measurable checks passed. 2 of the 9 standard checks couldn't be measured, so this is scored out of 7, not 9 — it isn't comparable to a published F-score.
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income $101.3M in FY2025.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow $98.2M (was -$15.2M the prior year).
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow $98.2M vs net income $101.3M.
    Why this matters: When cash generated exceeds reported earnings, profits are high-quality (not propped up by accruals or one-time items).
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets 5.2% vs 0.7% a year ago.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    The filing reports no interest-bearing debt in either year (total assets $1,946.6M).
  • Short-term liquidity (current ratio)
    Current ratio 5.75x vs 9.02x a year ago.
    Why this matters: The current ratio compares assets it can turn to cash within a year against bills due within a year. Below 1.0 means it may struggle to cover near-term obligations.
  • · Share count (dilution) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • · Pricing power (gross margin) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • Sales per asset (asset turnover)
    Asset turnover 0.00x vs 0.02x a year ago.
    Why this matters: Asset turnover measures how much revenue each dollar of assets generates. Rising = more productive use of the asset base.

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

Price$2.50
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard DCF?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
valuation is not meaningful for HTT due to its declining revenue (-61.2%/yr over 4yr), indicating a company in significant flux. Investors are likely focused on the company's ability to stabilize its revenue and leverage its positive net income and operating cash flow to find a new growth vector. The #1 quantifiable risk is the severe, sustained revenue decline.

⚠️ Revenue declining

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
For the stock to work, HTT must reverse its severe revenue decline from -61.2%/yr and find a sustainable growth path, leveraging its consistent profitability.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest fundamental risk is the continued revenue decline of -61.2%/yr, which implies a shrinking business that may eventually erode its positive net income and operating cash flow.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Stabilization or reversal of revenue decline in next earnings report
  • Announcement of new product lines or strategic initiatives
  • Maintenance of positive operating cash flow

The trend, in plain numbers (FY2024 → FY2025, latest reported)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

✅ Improving
  • Free cash flow turned positive at $81.6M.
  • Net income grew +706% to $101.3M.
⚠ Worsening
  • Revenue fell -80% to $5.9M.

Management & Leadership

Limited executive data available. The company's leadership is not widely publicized, making it difficult to assess specific executive tenures or strategic direction without further information.

What They Make

High Templar Tech Ltd (HTT) operates within the financial services sector, though specific products and customer base are not detailed in available information.

End Markets

Financial Services
Beta: 1.35

Why Is It Priced Like This?

No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer We aren't publishing a discounted-cash-flow value here: the model's output failed our plausibility checks, so showing it would imply more precision than we have.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market is likely pricing HTT based on its current profitability, with positive net income and operating cash flow in 4 out of 5 years, despite the severe revenue decline. Investors might be betting on a turnaround or a strategic pivot, given the company's adequate current ratio of 5.75, suggesting financial stability to pursue new initiatives.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Financial service offerings

The company funds itself through its positive operating cash flow, as no dividend or buyback information is available.

Free Cash Flow DCF

Standard FCF DCF: positive free cash flow in a sector suited for cash-flow-based valuation. FCF negative in 3/5 years.

Show advanced inputs
Revenue Growth-61.2%
Historical Fcf Growth27.3%
Sector Default8.0%
Best Estimate21.5%
Methodblend(70% fcf_cagr, 30% sector)
Growth Basisper_share

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project net interest income and fee-income lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Growth / re-investment phase

Revenue has been declining at -61.2%/yr over 4 years, while net income and operating cash flow have been positive in 4 out of 5 years.

Geography & Markets

Not available from current data sources. The company's primary regions of operation are not specified in the provided information.

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape neutral - aligned.
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
75.1OverboughtBought up hard recently — stretched; pullbacks are common from here.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BullishLine above signalThe fast trend is above the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently upward.
50-Day Average$2.42Price above (+3.3%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
200-Day Average$3.54Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (6 notes — click to expand/collapse)

HIGH Revenue declining
Guardrail Notes (5)
  • Shares from unknown — per-share values may be less accurate.
  • Illiquidity discount 25% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Shares/market cap missing or defaulted; per-share valuation unreliable.
  • Shares defaulted to 1; IV is NOT meaningful — treat as data-unavailable.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From High Templar Tech Ltd's SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
20255.9M101.3M
202429.7M12.6M
202317.8M5.5M
202283.7M-52.5M
2021259.6M92.4M

Cash Flow (5yr)

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
2025 98.2M 16.7M 81.6M
2024 -15.2M 43.6M 309,317 -59.1M
2023 49.6M 79.6M 695,190 -30.7M
2022 37.8M 39.7M 3.5M -5.3M
2021 144.7M 75.1M 5.5M 64.1M

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets1.9B
Total Liabilities283.3M
Equity1.7B

Similar companies worth a look

Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.

PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $HTT — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $HTT on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.