INTERNATIONAL TOWER HILL MINES LTD (THM) Stock Analysis

Price updated today · SEC data refreshed 2 months ago · Not investment advice

INTERNATIONAL TOWER HILL MINES LTD

THM Basic Materials Metal Mining📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 36/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 65/100 → +20.4
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 28/100 → +7.2
Total36/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $2.72 · today 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 2 months ago

How to read THM (cyclical commodity producer)

A miner or energy producer earns whatever the commodity price is, so a single DCF swings with the cycle. Judge it against peers and where you think the commodity cycle is heading.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 EV/Sales peer comparison ↓
    How the price compares to similar producers is more meaningful than a through-cycle DCF.
  2. 2 Interactive calculator (test cycle assumptions) ↓
    Flex the growth/discount inputs to see how sensitive the value is to where we are in the cycle.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
One rule first: never trade out of fear — and that includes the fear of missing out. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not data. If you can't point to the evidence behind a trade, you're more likely to lose. So whichever of these you are, check the data below before you act.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ Using the right valuation lens for this business type

Standard DCF doesn't fit THM well — but that's expected for this kind of business. The EV/Sales Peer Comparison below uses the metrics actually used by analysts who value metal mining. Reverse DCF + Football Field also work as cross-checks.

ⓘ Why a standard DCF doesn't settle this one — THM is a cyclical commodity producer

Miners, metals and energy producers earn whatever the commodity price is at the time. A discounted-cash-flow model leans on recent cash flow, so it swings with the cycle: the result is dominated by where we are in the commodity cycle rather than by durable business economics.

For this business type, lean on the EV/Sales peer comparison and Reverse-DCF below (how today's price compares to similar producers and what growth it implies), and weigh the commodity-price outlook. Treat the DCF number as a rough mid-cycle reference, not a buy/sell trigger.

ⓘ Why does THM trade at $2.72?

INTERNATIONAL TOWER HILL MINES LTD has 207.9 million shares outstanding. At $2.72 per share, the market values all outstanding THM equity at $565 million. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash (THM carries little or no debt, so the two are close here). The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values THM in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…

How does THM stack up against its closest peers?

We take the 8 same-industry companies most similar to THM (similar size) and check what investors are paying for each dollar of their revenue (or profits). If THM is much more expensive on the same yardstick, that's a red flag — unless you have a specific reason it deserves a premium. For a leveraged business, FCF yield (in the table) is usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 8 same-industry peers; implausible multiples excluded.

What THM would be worth at the median peer's multiple
Revenue/share data missing for THM — can't compute a peer-implied price. The multiples table above still works as context.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (8)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/Sales EV/GP EV/EBIT FCF Yield
ALOY REALLOYS INC. Metal Mining $561M 230.6x 480.8x 0.1%
CRMLW Critical Metals Corp. Metal Mining $510M
LZM Lifezone Metals Ltd Metal Mining $449M 857.6x
WRN Western Copper & Gold Corp Metal Mining $447M
DC Dakota Gold Corp. Metal Mining $771M 0.2%
GSM Ferroglobe PLC Metal Mining $809M
NB NIOCORP DEVELOPMENTS LTD Metal Mining $840M 0.2%
NIOBW NIOCORP DEVELOPMENTS LTD Metal Mining $274M 0.5%

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski checks
2 passed · 4 failed · 3 n/a
Partial result, not a standard F-score: 2 of 6 measurable checks passed. 3 of the 9 standard checks couldn't be measured, so this is scored out of 6, not 9 — it isn't comparable to a published F-score.
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
  • Positive net income
    Net income -$4.6M in the latest year.
    Why this matters: Does the company actually earn a profit? Sustained losses eventually force it to raise money — diluting you — or take on debt.
  • Positive operating cash flow
    Operating cash flow -$3.6M (was -$2.9M the prior year).
    Why this matters: Profit can be an accounting figure; cash from running the business is harder to fake. Negative operating cash flow means the core business consumes cash and must be funded externally.
  • Cash flow backs up reported profit
    Operating cash flow -$3.6M vs net income -$4.6M.
  • Return on assets improving
    Return on assets -8.2% vs -6.4% a year ago.
    Why this matters: Is the company squeezing more profit out of each dollar of assets than last year? Rising = getting more efficient; falling = the opposite.
  • Debt load (vs assets)
    Long-term debt is 0.0% of assets vs 0.0% a year ago ($0.0M now).
  • · Short-term liquidity (current ratio) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • Share count (dilution)
    Share count rose 4.1% (199.7M → 207.9M year-over-year).
    Why this matters: Issuing lots of new shares splits the pie into more pieces, shrinking your slice. Stable or falling share count protects existing owners.
  • · Pricing power (gross margin) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)
  • · Sales per asset (asset turnover) (n/a — data not reported; not scored)

Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.

Cash Runway
4 mo
CRITICAL — under 6 months of cash

Plain English: the company holds about $1M in cash and is burning roughly $4M/year in operations. At that pace, the cash lasts 4 mo before it must raise capital (diluting shareholders), take on debt, or cut spending.

Assumes constant burn and ignores financing/asset sales. For pre-profit biotech and growth companies, this matters more than a DCF — a great drug pipeline is worthless if they run out of money before approval.

Price$2.72
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. See Reverse DCF and Football Field below.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. because the company exhibits negative net income and operating cash flow, indicating it is not yet generating profits or consistent cash from operations. Investors are likely betting on the future potential of its mineral assets, specifically the Livengood gold project, rather than current financial performance. The primary quantifiable risk is the continued negative operating cash flow, which necessitates external financing.

⚠️ Cyclical sector: using normalized cash flow (median OCF minus estimated maintenance capex).

As of 2 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

THM INTERNATIONAL TOWER HILL MINES LTD stock anatomy showing per-share revenue, operating expenses, free cash flow, and debt
Plain English: $3/share buys no measurable revenue per share, generates $0.02 lost per share per year, and $0.02 of cash burned per share (negative free cash flow). Each share carries $0.00 of debt.
What's free cash flow / what do these mean?

Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.

Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.

Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.

Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
For the stock to work, the Livengood gold project must advance successfully towards production, demonstrating a clear path to positive operating cash flow and eventual profitability.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest fundamental risk is the continued negative operating cash flow, which implies ongoing dilution through equity raises or potential project delays if financing becomes difficult.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Updates on Livengood project feasibility studies
  • Announcements regarding project financing or partnerships
  • Trends in gold commodity prices

The trend, in plain numbers (2024 → 2025)

Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.

✅ Improving

Nothing clearly improving year-over-year.

⚠ Worsening
  • Free cash flow is negative at -$4.3M — the cash burn widened vs last year.
  • Still unprofitable at -$4.6M — loss widening.

Management & Leadership

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is led by Karl Hanneman as President and CEO, who has been with the company for several years, guiding its exploration and development efforts. Stephen Lang serves as the Chairman of the Board, bringing extensive experience in the mining sector.

Karl Hanneman
President & Chief Executive Officer
Stephen Lang
Chairman of the Board

What They Make

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is a mineral exploration company focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties. Its primary asset is the Livengood gold project in Alaska, targeting the production of gold.

End Markets

Gold miningPrecious metalsMineral exploration

Revenue Drivers

Future gold production
Gold commodity prices
Resource development
Market Cap: 565.4MBeta: 1.94

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Potential future gold supply
Exposure to gold price appreciation
Resource development expertise
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer This company's reported free cash flow is negative, so a discounted-cash-flow valuation has no positive cash stream to discount. That is a fact about the business, not missing data — the reported figures below are complete.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market prices THM based on the future potential of its Livengood gold project, as a cash-flow model is not applicable given its negative net income and operating cash flow. Investors are likely focused on the optionality and long-term value of its gold resources, anticipating future development and production rather than current profitability. The company's valuation reflects a bet on successful project development and favorable gold prices.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Exploration and development of mineral properties
Potential future gold sales
Resource monetization through partnerships or sale

The company funds itself primarily through equity raises and other external financing, as it has negative operating cash flow and does not pay dividends or engage in buybacks.

Normalized FCF

Cyclical/commodity sector (Metal Mining) with negative current FCF: normalized FCF uses multi-year median to smooth through the cycle.

Show advanced inputs
SectorDefault5.0%
BestEstimate5.0%
Methodsector_default
GrowthBasistotal

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project production volumes, realized commodity prices and unit cash costs independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Cyclical / commodity-linked producer

Moat Signals

Large-scale gold resource (Livengood project)
Strategic location in Alaska
Experienced management in mineral exploration

Net income and operating cash flow have been negative in the latest period and for the past five years.

Geography & Markets

International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. is primarily focused on its Livengood gold project located in Alaska, USA. The company's operations are concentrated in this single region.

Geographic Risks

Concentration risk in a single project (Livengood)
Geopolitical and regulatory risks in Alaska

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape bullish
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
58.7NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BullishLine above signalThe fast trend is above the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently upward.
50-Day Average$2.43Price above (+11.9%)Price above its 50-day average = near-term uptrend.
200-Day Average$2.13Price aboveThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossGolden50-day above 200-dayA "golden cross" — the medium trend has overtaken the long trend (often read as bullish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (8 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (8)
  • Cyclical sector: using normalized cash flow (median OCF minus estimated maintenance capex).
  • Median OCF is negative — OCF-based normalization not applicable.
  • Normalized OCF-capex was negative. Falling back to median raw FCF.
  • No positive normalized FCF. Using EPS as proxy.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Illiquidity discount 7% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Extreme valuation (P/IV 32.3775x, IV $0.08 vs price $2.71); output dominated by data/units issue (often a multi-class share-count mismatch). Suppressed.
  • DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From INTERNATIONAL TOWER HILL MINES LTD's SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
2025-4.6M$-0.02
2024-3.6M$-0.02
2023-3.4M$-0.02
2022-3.0M$-0.02
2021-6.0M$-0.03

Cash Flow (5yr)

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBC & adj.Free Cash Flow
2025 -3.6M 697,774 -4.3M
2024 -2.9M 613,690 -3.5M
2023 -3.2M 415,186 -3.6M
2022 -2.9M 448,474 -3.3M
2021 -5.3M 535,117 -5.9M

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: -3.6M − — − 697,774 (SBC & adj.) = -4.3M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a normalized multi-year median, not this single year.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets56.9M
Total Liabilities497,952
Equity56.4M
PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $THM — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $THM on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.