TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC (TTMI) Stock Analysis
TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC
▾ What's in the 51/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.
How to read TTMI
We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.
-
1
Reported earnings & margins ↓
What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
-
2
Balance sheet & book value ↓
Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
-
3
Who's selling & betting against it ↓
Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
The share count we read for TTMI looks wrong — common for multi-class / founder-controlled filers that report shares per share-class. That makes per-share figures (including intrinsic value) misleading, so we suppressed them. The company's total financials below are sound.
What to use instead: Lean on the totals — revenue, net income, cash flow — and the balance sheet. Multi-class share counts are being corrected; once fixed, the per-share valuation returns automatically.
This note is only about the single DCF fair-value number — TTMI's full financial statements, health scores, and written analysis are all below.
Football field: where does the price sit?
Different valuation methods produce different fair-value ranges depending on assumptions. Plotting them together lets you see at a glance whether the current price is reasonable across approaches, or only one specific lens.
Industry multiples sourced from: industry: Semiconductors. See the Peer Basket section below for the peer comparison and its limited-comparables caveat.
⚠ We found only 2 genuine same-industry (Semiconductors) comparables — fewer than the 4 we require for a reliable median. The 8 names in the table below therefore include 6 broader Technology names marked fallback, whose business models and margins differ — which is why any median below is computed over that wider set, not over true comparables. So we do not derive a peer-implied share value here. Read the multiples as rough context only.
How does TTMI stack up against its closest peers?
Ideally we compare TTMI only to same-industry peers, but too few exist in our universe right now, so the basket below mixes in broader-sector names. Treat the multiples as rough context, not a valuation. For a leveraged business, EV/EBIT and FCF yield (both in the table) are usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.
▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?
EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.
EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).
p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.
| EV / SalesEV / Sales — For every $1 of yearly revenue, this is how many dollars investors pay to own the whole business (including debt). Why it matters: Works for pre-profit growth companies where P/E and FCF don't apply. The most apples-to-apples cross-company multiple because it ignores accounting choices. Reference: 1–3x for mature companies · 4–10x for software/SaaS · 10–20x for hypergrowth · >20x is rare and demanding Full explanation → |
2.9x / 6.7x / 10.5x |
| EV / Gross ProfitEV / Gross Profit — Enterprise value divided by gross profit — the multiple paid for what each dollar of sales contributes after direct costs. Why it matters: More refined than EV/Sales for high-margin businesses (software, marketplaces) where gross margin is the real economic engine. Reference: 8–15x for SaaS · 15–25x for hypergrowth software · >30x demanding Full explanation → |
18.3x / 19.5x / 20.6x |
| EV / EBITEV / EBITDA — Enterprise value divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization. Why it matters: A classic "what would a private buyer pay" multiple — used in M&A. Strips out tax and capital-structure noise. Reference: 8–12x for mature businesses · 15–25x for growth · Below 5x often signals distress Full explanation → |
25.9x / 34.3x / 39.3x |
Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 8 peers (broad — see caveat); implausible multiples excluded.
⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.
▾ View peer list (8)
| Ticker | Company | Industry | Mcap | EV/Sales | EV/GP | EV/EBIT | FCF Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SANM | SANMINA CORP | Semiconductors | $13.9B | 1.7x | 19.5x | 39.3x | 2.9% |
| NXT | Nextpower Inc. | Semiconductors | $23.9B | 6.7x | 20.6x | 34.3x | 1.6% |
| VICR | VICOR CORP | Semiconductors ·fallback | $15.2B | 37.3x | 58.7x | 186.0x | 0.7% |
| RMBS | RAMBUS INC | Semiconductors ·fallback | $15.7B | 22.2x | 27.9x | 60.4x | 1.8% |
| SITM | SITIME Corp | Semiconductors ·fallback | $18.7B | 57.4x | 107.1x | — | 0.1% |
| VIAV | VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC. | Semiconductors ·fallback | $11.4B | 10.5x | 18.3x | 197.5x | 1.2% |
| LSCC | LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP | Semiconductors ·fallback | $20.2B | 38.5x | 56.5x | 1,794.1x | 0.3% |
| QRVO | Qorvo, Inc. | Semiconductors ·fallback | $9.1B | 2.9x | 6.3x | 25.9x | 5.6% |
Quality & solvency checks
Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
▾ The checks — what passed, what didn't (and what we couldn't measure)
-
✓ Positive net incomeNet income $177.4M in the latest year.
-
✓ Positive operating cash flowOperating cash flow $291.9M (was $236.9M the prior year).
-
✓ Cash flow backs up reported profitOperating cash flow $291.9M vs net income $177.4M.
-
✓ Return on assets improvingReturn on assets 4.6% vs 1.6% a year ago.
-
✓ Debt load (vs assets)Long-term debt is 23.9% of assets vs 26.4% a year ago ($916.2M now).
-
✗ Short-term liquidity (current ratio)Current ratio 1.93x vs 1.99x a year ago.Why this matters: The current ratio compares assets it can turn to cash within a year against bills due within a year. Below 1.0 means it may struggle to cover near-term obligations.
-
✗ Share count (dilution)Share count rose 1.3% (104.1M → 105.5M year-over-year).Why this matters: Issuing lots of new shares splits the pie into more pieces, shrinking your slice. Stable or falling share count protects existing owners.
-
✓ Pricing power (gross margin)Gross margin 20.7% vs 19.5% a year ago.
-
✓ Sales per asset (asset turnover)Asset turnover 0.76x vs 0.70x a year ago.
Missing data is never counted as a pass or a fail — it's shown as n/a and excluded from the denominator. Each check compares the company against its own prior year.
What if you assume different inputs?
Here's where we land — and what happens if you change the assumptions. Drag the sliders to set your own Discount RateDiscount Rate — The annual return you demand for taking single-stock risk instead of buying a safe Treasury or index fund.
Why it matters: Higher discount rate = stricter valuation (a stock has to produce more cash to be worth holding). Lower = more generous.
Reference: 8–12% is standard · 9–10% matches S&P 500 historical return · Below 7% is illogical for single-stock risk
Full explanation → (the annual return you demand for single-stock risk) and terminal growth; the value updates live so you can see whether the stock looks cheaper or richer. The discount rate starts at 10.0%, the figure our model used for TTMI. Open Advanced to also change beta, growth and the rate path.
Note: no headline intrinsic value is published for this stock (the valuation is held for a data-quality reason — see the notes above). The calculator below is a what-if tool: the values it produces are your assumptions played out, not our estimate.
A full intrinsic value isn't shown for TTMI because the valuation is currently held for a data-quality reason (see the guardrail notes above). The reverse-DCF reading still works — it needs only the price and cash flow — but we won't publish a forward value until the underlying data passes our checks.
—
⚙ Advanced — tinker with every input (beta, growth, rate path, margin → full intrinsic value)
A standard discounted cash flowDCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation → (DCF) valuation is not meaningful for TTMTTM (Trailing Twelve Months) — The most recent 12 months of results, added up from the last four quarters.
Why it matters: It gives the freshest full-year picture between annual reports, instead of waiting for the calendar year to close.
Full explanation → Technologies due to its 'Extreme valuation' flag, where the price is significantly higher than the model's intrinsic valueIntrinsic Value — Our DCF model's estimate of what each share is mathematically worth based on projected cash flows.
Why it matters: Compare to current price. Below IV = potentially undervalued. Above IV = priced for growth that must actually happen.
Reference: Model-derived; quality depends on data and assumptions.
Full explanation →, suggesting the market is pricing optionality or future growth beyond current cash flows. Investors are likely betting on continued 'Gross margin expanding' and 'Revenue growing' trends. The primary quantifiable risk is the 'Long-term debt RISING', which could impact future financial flexibility.
As of 2 months ago
Anatomy of a share
What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.
What's free cash flow / what do these mean?
Revenue per share — how much the business earns from customers, divided by the number of shares outstanding. Top of the income statement.
Earnings per share — profit left after operating costs, interest, and taxes, per share. Two versions appear on this page and are not interchangeable: GAAP diluted EPS uses the company's weighted-average diluted share count during the reporting period (this is the "earnings" in "price-to-earnings"); net income per current share divides annual net income by today's share count. They differ whenever the share count has changed.
Owner-earnings free cash flow per share — the cash the business produces for shareholders. Savng's owner-earnings FCF subtracts capital expenditures and stock-based compensation from operating cash flow (SBC is a real dilution cost even though it's non-cash). This is deliberately more conservative than "standard" FCF, which subtracts only capital expenditures — so our figure is lower than the headline FCF you'll see elsewhere. FCF funds dividends, buybacks, debt repayment, and acquisitions; a company can report positive earnings yet negative FCF.
Debt per share — total interest-bearing borrowings divided by shares. High debt-per-share next to thin FCF-per-share is a fragility signal.
What you actually need to decide
Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.
- Continued expansion of gross margins in future quarters
- Stabilization or reduction in long-term debt levels
- Announcements of new design wins in high-growth end markets
The trend, in plain numbers (2024 → 2025)
Straight from the financial statements — no model, no opinion. For a small or unprofitable company, the direction of these numbers usually tells you more than any single valuation.
- Revenue grew +19% to $2.91B.
- Gross margin improved to 21% (+1 pts).
- Net income grew +215% to $177.4M.
- Free cash flow is negative at -$42.4M — the cash burn widened vs last year.
Management & Leadership
Thomas Edman has served as the President and CEO of TTMTTM (Trailing Twelve Months) — The most recent 12 months of results, added up from the last four quarters.
Why it matters: It gives the freshest full-year picture between annual reports, instead of waiting for the calendar year to close.
Full explanation → Technologies since 2006, overseeing the company's growth in the printed circuit board and radio frequency components industry. He has been instrumental in guiding the company's strategic acquisitions and operational expansions.
What They Make
TTMTTM (Trailing Twelve Months) — The most recent 12 months of results, added up from the last four quarters.
Why it matters: It gives the freshest full-year picture between annual reports, instead of waiting for the calendar year to close.
Full explanation → Technologies manufactures printed circuit boards (PCBs) and radio frequency (RF) components, which are essential building blocks for electronic devices across various industries. Their products are sold to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and contract manufacturers.
End Markets
Revenue Drivers
Why Is It Priced Like This?
Why Customers Pay
What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.
The market is likely pricing TTMTTM (Trailing Twelve Months) — The most recent 12 months of results, added up from the last four quarters.
Why it matters: It gives the freshest full-year picture between annual reports, instead of waiting for the calendar year to close.
Full explanation → Technologies based on its 'Revenue growing' at 8.9%/yr and 'Gross margin expanding' from 16.5% to 20.7%, indicating operational improvements and future profitability potential. The market may be assigning value to the company's ability to innovate in advanced PCB technologies for emerging high-growth sectors like AI hardware or autonomous systems, which is not in the model.
Business Model & Valuation
How They Make Money
The company has been 'Operating cash flow POSITIVE latest' and 'Net income POSITIVE latest', suggesting it can fund operations internally, though 'Long-term debt RISING' indicates some reliance on external financing for growth or acquisitions.
Growth / Revenue DCF
Negative free cash flow: revenue/margin growth model used - standard FCF DCF is unreliable for companies still scaling.
Show advanced inputs
| RevenueGrowth | 8.9% |
What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project product, services and recurring/cloud lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.
Maturity & Competitive Position
Moat Signals
Revenue has been growing at 8.9%/yr over three years, from $2249M to $2906M, and net income has been positive for the latest four years.
Geography & Markets
TTMTTM (Trailing Twelve Months) — The most recent 12 months of results, added up from the last four quarters.
Why it matters: It gives the freshest full-year picture between annual reports, instead of waiting for the calendar year to close.
Full explanation → Technologies operates globally, with manufacturing facilities and sales offices across North America, Europe, and Asia. While specific geographic mix percentages are not available, the company serves a diverse international customer base.
Geographic Risks
Market Signals
These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation → (14)57.2NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.
QUALITY
Data Quality & Risk Flags (4 notes — click to expand/collapse)
Guardrail Notes (4)
- FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.
- Price is 5.4x model IV - market may be pricing optionality, narrative catalysts, or margin expansion beyond what trailing cash flows support.
- Extreme valuation (P/IV 5.3535x, IV $32.45 vs price $173.72); output dominated by data/units issue (often a multi-class share-count mismatch). Suppressed.
- DATA UNAVAILABLE: per-share values suppressed due to missing/unreliable shares data.
FINANCIALS
Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)
From TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC's SEC filings (EDGAR).
Income (5yr)
| Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.9B | 177.4M | $1.68 |
| 2024 | 2.4B | 56.3M | $0.54 |
| 2023 | 2.5B | 94.6M | $0.91 |
| 2022 | 2.2B | 54.4M | $0.50 |
Cash Flow (5yr)
| Year | Operating CF | CapEx | − SBC & adj. | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 291.9M | 292.6M | 41.7M | -42.4M |
| 2024 | 236.9M | 185.7M | 29.8M | 21.4M |
| 2023 | 272.9M | 102.9M | 19.5M | 150.5M |
| 2022 | 176.6M | 82.0M | 17.7M | 77.0M |
How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). Latest year: 291.9M − 292.6M − 41.7M (SBC & adj.) = -42.4M. This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a projected from revenue × terminal margin, not this single year.
Balance Sheet
| Total Assets | 3.8B |
| Total Liabilities | — |
| Equity | 1.8B |
| Total Debt | 916.2M |
Similar companies worth a look
Same sector and industry, similar fundamentals shape. Verify everything yourself — this list is computed mechanically and does not reflect our judgment about whether any of these are a good investment.