Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp (TVACW) Stock Analysis

Price updated today · SEC data refreshed 11 days ago · Not investment advice

Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp

TVACW Financial Services SPACs📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 29/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Fundamental health (43%) 20/100 → +8.6
leverage 20/100
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (31%) 42/100 → +13.2
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (26%) 28/100 → +7.2
Total29/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $0.47 · today 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 11 days ago

How to read TVACW

We are not publishing an intrinsic value for this one — the section below says exactly why. Everything on this page that comes straight from the filings and the tape is still here; treat the missing valuation as a known gap, not as a verdict on the business.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 Reported earnings & margins ↓
    What the company actually reported — unaffected by the valuation being held.
  2. 2 Balance sheet & book value ↓
    Assets, liabilities and equity as filed.
  3. 3 Who's selling & betting against it ↓
    Insider and short-interest behaviour needs no valuation model.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
One rule first: never trade out of fear — and that includes the fear of missing out. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not data. If you can't point to the evidence behind a trade, you're more likely to lose. So whichever of these you are, check the data below before you act.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ TVACW is a thinly-disclosed company trading over-the-counter

It files little or nothing with the SEC — so our cash-flow models, financial statements, and U.S. insider data (Form 4) don't apply. What's still real: the live U.S. price and short positioning. Here's what we could pull from other sources:

Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp - Warrants (23/04/2030)

📑 Read the real filings: latest SEC 10-Q ↗

Identity, share count and tier from FINRA + OTC Markets; not a substitute for the home-market financial statements. Thin U.S. disclosure + OTC trading is itself a risk factor.

Loading insider & short-seller data…

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The F-score compares two consecutive years of income, cash-flow and balance-sheet data. We have 1 year of income data for this filer, but no machine-readable balance sheet — so several of the nine checks have no input at all. We show nothing rather than score a partial year against itself. The reported figures in the financial tables below are unaffected.

Price$0.47
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. See Reverse DCF and Football Field below.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp (TVACW) because its operating cash flow is negative, indicating it is not yet generating profits. The model projects future cash flows from a revenue trajectory, but currently implies no positive equity value, suggesting a highly speculative valuation. Investors are likely betting on the successful completion of a business combination, which would transform the company's financial profile. The biggest risk to our assumptions is that the model projects no positive equity value, highlighting the speculative nature and potential for complete loss of capital if a suitable target is not found or the deal fails.

⚠️ FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.

As of 11 days ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
The most important operating factor for TVACW is the successful identification and completion of a business combination with a promising private company that can generate substantial future revenue and cash flow. This would transform the company into an operating entity with a viable business model.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest operating risk is the failure to identify and complete a suitable business combination within the mandated timeframe, leading to liquidation and a return of capital to shareholders, potentially at a loss. The current negative operating cash flow highlights the lack of an underlying business prior to a merger.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Announcement of a definitive merger agreement
  • Shareholder vote on the proposed business combination
  • Completion of the de-SPAC transaction

Management & Leadership

Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp is a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses. As a SPAC, it does not have traditional operating executives in the same way a mature company would. Its leadership typically consists of a Chairman and CEO focused on identifying and executing a merger target.

J. Patrick O'Neill
Chairman and CEO
Michael J. O'Neill
Chief Financial Officer
John C. O'Neill
Chief Operating Officer

What They Make

Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp is a blank check company that raises capital through an initial public offering (IPO) to acquire or merge with an existing private company. The investors in the SPAC are essentially paying for the opportunity to invest in a future, as-yet-unidentified private company that will become public through the merger.

End Markets

Financial ServicesMergers & AcquisitionsPrivate Equity

Revenue Drivers

Interest income on trust account assets
Future business combination
Sponsor capital contributions
Beta: 0.55

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Provides a path for private companies to go public
Offers investors exposure to growth companies
Facilitates capital formation for target businesses
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer This company's reported free cash flow is negative, so a discounted-cash-flow valuation has no positive cash stream to discount. That is a fact about the business, not missing data — the reported figures below are complete.

What we use instead: earnings (P/E, EV/EBIT), book value (P/B) — computed from the figures this company does report, shown in the sections below. Those numbers are unaffected by the missing cash-flow data.

The market is pricing TVACW based on the expectation of a successful business combination, rather than current cash flows, as its operating cash flow is negative. The market may be assigning value to the optionality of identifying and merging with a high-growth private company, which is not in the model. This optionality may or may not materialize, making the valuation highly speculative. The current ratio of 4.1 indicates adequate liquidity to pursue a deal.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Interest earned on funds held in trust
Future equity issuance in a de-SPAC transaction
Sponsor promote (founder shares)

As a SPAC, the company primarily funds itself through initial public offerings and private placements, with capital held in a trust account. There are no dividends or buybacks as it is pre-business combination.

Growth / Revenue DCF

Negative free cash flow: revenue/margin growth model used - standard FCF DCF is unreliable for companies still scaling.

Show advanced inputs
RevenueGrowth15.0%

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project net interest income and fee-income lines independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Growth / re-investment phase

Moat Signals

Experienced management team in M&A
Access to capital markets
Network for sourcing target companies

Operating cash flow has been negative in the latest period, with positive operating cash flow in 0 out of 1 years, indicating a pre-revenue or pre-operating business phase.

Geography & Markets

Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp is a US-headquartered SPAC. Its focus for potential business combinations is generally broad, though often with an emphasis on North American companies, given its US base. Specific geographic revenue mix is not applicable as it is a pre-merger entity.

Geographic Risks

Regulatory risk related to SPAC transactions and de-SPAC processes
Execution risk in identifying and completing a suitable business combination

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape neutral - aligned.
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
50.6NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$0.56Price below (-16.1%)Price below its 50-day average = near-term downtrend.
200-Day Average$0.78Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (9 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (9)
  • FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.
  • INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive. Model may not be appropriate.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Shares from unknown — per-share values may be less accurate.
  • Illiquidity discount 25% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).
  • Shares/market cap missing or defaulted; per-share valuation unreliable.
  • Shares defaulted to 1; IV is NOT meaningful — treat as data-unavailable.
  • VALUATION HELD (MISSING_SHARE_COUNT): per-share values suppressed due to shares/market cap missing or unreliable.
  • Extreme valuation gap (P/IV null): result may be dominated by model assumptions, share count issues, or sector-specific dynamics. Treat as low confidence.

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Texas Ventures Acquisition III Corp's SEC filings (EDGAR).

Income (5yr)

YearRevenueNet IncomeEPS
20255.9M

Cash Flow (5yr)

YearOperating CFCapEx− SBCFree Cash Flow
2025 -437,989 -437,989

How we define FCF: operating cash flow − capital expenditure − stock-based compensation (owner-earnings basis — SBC is a real cost to shareholders even though it's non-cash). This is the same owner-earnings FCF definition the valuation model uses, though the DCF's starting value is a projected from revenue × terminal margin, not this single year.

Balance Sheet

Total Assets233.5M
Total Liabilities9.2M
Equity-8.2M
PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed 11 days ago (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $TVACW — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $TVACW on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.