Osisko Development Corp. (ODV) Stock Analysis

Price updated 4 days ago · SEC data refreshed 3 months ago · Not investment advice

Osisko Development Corp.

ODV Basic Materials Gold & Silver Mining📄 SEC filings ↗
Valuation N/A
▾ What's in the 51/100 risk score? (higher = riskier)
Smart money (short interest + insider buying) (55%) 65/100 → +35.8
Macro backdrop (VIX, curve, credit, fear/greed + week-over-week momentum) (45%) 33/100 → +14.9
Total51/100

Contributions (weight × component score) sum to the total. This near-term score now includes fundamental health (leverage, FCF trend). See the Financial Health section for the full balance-sheet read.

💵 Price $2.31 · 4 days ago 📄 Financials SEC EDGAR · refreshed 3 months ago

How to read ODV (cyclical commodity producer)

A miner or energy producer earns whatever the commodity price is, so a single DCF swings with the cycle. Judge it against peers and where you think the commodity cycle is heading.

Where to start — the sections that matter most for this stock
  1. 1 EV/Sales peer comparison ↓
    How the price compares to similar producers is more meaningful than a through-cycle DCF.
  2. 2 Interactive calculator (test cycle assumptions) ↓
    Flex the growth/discount inputs to see how sensitive the value is to where we are in the cycle.
Or — what are you trying to decide?
A note on process: fear-driven decisions — including fear of missing out — tend to be the expensive ones. A stock up 10% a day for three days is excitement, not evidence. Whichever reader you are, the data below is there to be checked before anything is decided.
🚀
"It's surging — should I chase it?"
The momentum / FOMO trade. Before you chase, see whether the people who know it best are quietly selling into the rally.
🏷️
"Is it a cheap bargain?"
The deep-value trade. How far below assets and our value it trades — and whether it's cheap for a reason.
ⓘ ODV is a thinly-disclosed company trading over-the-counter

It files little or nothing with the SEC — so our cash-flow models, financial statements, and U.S. insider data (Form 4) don't apply. What's still real: the live U.S. price and short positioning. Here's what we could pull from other sources:

North American Potash Developments Inc

📑 Read the real filings: check the company's home-market exchange.

Identity, share count and tier from FINRA + OTC Markets; not a substitute for the home-market financial statements. Thin U.S. disclosure + OTC trading is itself a risk factor.

ⓘ Why a standard DCF doesn't settle this one — ODV is a cyclical commodity producer

Miners, metals and energy producers earn whatever the commodity price is at the time. A discounted-cash-flow model leans on recent cash flow, so it swings with the cycle: the result is dominated by where we are in the commodity cycle rather than by durable business economics.

For this business type, lean on the EV/Sales peer comparison and Reverse-DCF below (how today's price compares to similar producers and what growth it implies), and weigh the commodity-price outlook. Treat the DCF number as a rough mid-cycle reference, not a buy/sell trigger.

ⓘ Why does ODV trade at $2.31?

Osisko Development Corp. has 255.1 million shares outstanding. At $2.31 per share, the market values all outstanding ODV equity at $589 million. That's market capitalization, not enterprise value — enterprise value also accounts for debt and cash (ODV carries little or no debt, so the two are close here). The share price by itself tells you almost nothing — a company can pick any share price by splitting or issuing more shares. What matters is the total value (Market Cap?Market Cap — The total dollar value the market is assigning to the entire company.
Why it matters: This is the number that actually matters when comparing companies. Two companies with the same business but different share counts have the same market cap.
Reference: Mega cap >$200B · Large $10–200B · Mid $2–10B · Small $300M–2B · Micro <$300M
Full explanation →
) compared to what the business actually produces. This page values ODV in Per Share?Per Share — A company-level figure divided by total shares — what one share represents.
Why it matters: Per-share metrics are the only way to fairly compare two companies with different share counts.
Full explanation →
economics — what each share represents of the underlying business. Play with the share-price calculator on the homepage →

Loading insider & short-seller data…
Checking filings for failure warnings…

How does ODV stack up against its closest peers?

We take the 8 same-industry companies most similar to ODV (similar size) and check what investors are paying for each dollar of their revenue (or profits). If ODV is much more expensive on the same yardstick, that's a red flag — unless you have a specific reason it deserves a premium. For a leveraged business, EV/EBIT and FCF yield (both in the table) are usually more reliable than EV/Sales, because revenue multiples ignore differences in margins and debt.

▾ What's "EV / Sales" in plain English?

EV (Enterprise Value) = market cap + total debt − cash. It's "what you'd pay to buy the entire company outright" — you pay the market cap to shareholders and take over their debt, but you keep their cash. EV is fairer than market cap alone because it includes the debt the new owner inherits.

EV / Sales = EV ÷ annual revenue. So "2.5×" means investors pay $2.50 of enterprise value per $1 of yearly sales. Higher = market is paying more per dollar of sales (usually because they expect future growth or fat margins).

p25 / median / p75 are the 25th, 50th (middle), and 75th percentile of the peers' multiples. Half the peers fall between p25 and p75. The median (p50) is the typical peer — that's the benchmark we compare to.

What peers trade at (p25 / median / p75)

Bold middle number = median peer. Half the peers trade above it, half below. Computed over 8 same-industry peers; implausible multiples excluded.

Peer-implied value check
Revenue/share data missing for ODV — can't compute a peer-implied price. The multiples table above still works as context.

⚠️ Important caveat: peer multiples only work if the peers are genuinely comparable. Always check the peer list below — if the auto-picker grabbed micro-caps or unrelated businesses, the comparison is noise. A medical-device giant priced against tiny biotech startups won't produce a useful signal.

▾ View peer list (8)
Ticker Company Industry Mcap EV/Sales EV/GPEV/EBIT FCF Yield
IDR Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. Gold & Silver Mining $618M 14.6x 23.7x39.8x 0.1%
CTGO Contango Silver & Gold Inc. Gold & Silver Mining $619M 9.4x 0.0%
CNL Collective Mining Ltd. Gold & Silver Mining $560M
URG UR-ENERGY INC Gold & Silver Mining $644M 23.7x 8,698.3x 0.6%
TMCR Metals Royalty Co Inc. Gold & Silver Mining $654M
ITRG Integra Resources Corp. Gold & Silver Mining $499M 5.3x
GROY Gold Royalty Corp. Gold & Silver Mining $710M
NFGC New Found Gold Corp. Gold & Silver Mining $712M

Quality & solvency checks

Cheap stocks can be cheap for a reason. These screens warn when a low valuation comes paired with structural fragility.

Altman Z-Score?Altman Z-Score — A bankruptcy-risk score combining 5 financial ratios into one number. Predictive of bankruptcy within 2 years.
Why it matters: Cheap-looking stocks (low P/E or P/B) often have low Z-scores because the market knows the company is dying. Z-score warns you before you fall into a value trap.
Reference: > 3.0 = safe zone · 1.81–3.0 = grey zone · < 1.81 = distress zone
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The Z-score needs working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, sales and total assets from the latest balance sheet, and at least one of those isn't reported in machine-readable form here — common for foreign private issuers. We leave it blank rather than compute a distress verdict from an estimated input. It doesn't affect the reported figures in the financial tables below.

Piotroski F-Score?Piotroski F-Score — A 9-point quality checklist scoring profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.
Why it matters: High score = fundamentals improving. Low score = deteriorating. Especially powerful for filtering cheap stocks: cheap + high F-score historically outperforms; cheap + low F-score is often a value trap.
Reference: 7–9 = strong · 4–6 = mediocre · 0–3 = weak
Full explanation →
Not available for this filer

The F-score compares two consecutive years of income, cash-flow and balance-sheet data. We have 0 years of income data for this filer, but no machine-readable cash-flow statement or balance sheet — so several of the nine checks have no input at all. We show nothing rather than score a partial year against itself. The reported figures in the financial tables below are unaffected.

Price$2.31
Model IVNot applicable — DCF couldn't price this stock. The other valuation lenses on this page (reverse-DCF, peers, sector lens — whichever apply to this filer) carry the read instead.

A standard discounted cash flow?DCF — Discounted Cash Flow — sums up all future cash a business will produce, adjusted for the fact that future dollars are worth less than dollars today.
Why it matters: It is the most fundamentally honest valuation method when applicable — but only works for companies with predictable, positive cash flow.
Reference: Best for: mature, profitable businesses. Fails for: pre-profit growth, banks, REITs.
Full explanation →
(DCF) valuation is not meaningful for Osisko Development Corp. because its free cash flow?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
is negative, indicating a cash-burning growth stage. Investors are likely betting on the future production and profitability of its gold and silver mining projects, which are not yet fully reflected in current cash flows. The market may be assigning value to the optionality of new resource discoveries and successful project development, which is not in the model. The number one quantifiable risk is the company's inability to generate positive free cash flow, as indicated by the 'FCF negative' flag.

⚠️ FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.

As of 3 months ago

Anatomy of a share

What you're buying per share. Bars are at the same scale so you can see the relative size of revenue, costs, cash flow, and debt — not just read them in a table.

Per-share economics aren't reliable for this filer. Its income statement or share count isn't fully reported to SEC EDGAR (common for foreign private issuers and thinly-disclosed OTC names), so we don't break it down per share here — the figures would be misleading. See the financial tables below for what is reported.

What you actually need to decide

Every stock price is a disagreement. Here's the single thing that must go right for the bulls, the single thing that breaks the thesis, and the concrete signposts to watch so you can update your view as real results arrive.

🐂 The Bull Case
For the stock to perform, the company must successfully advance its mining projects to production, leading to positive operating cash flow and a reduction in the 'FCF?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
negative' status.
🐻 The Bear Case
The biggest fundamental risk is the continued 'FCF?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
negative' status, which implies ongoing cash burn and potential dilution if the company cannot achieve profitable production.
📌 Signposts to watch — update your view as these print
  • Announcements of increased resource estimates
  • Progress reports on mine construction and development
  • First gold/silver pour from new projects

Management & Leadership

Osisko Development Corp. is led by CEO and Chairman Sean Roosen, who has been instrumental in the company's strategic direction since its inception. The executive team focuses on advancing the company's portfolio of gold and silver assets.

Sean Roosen
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Chris Lodder
President

What They Make

Osisko Development Corp. is a gold and silver mining company focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of precious metal properties. Its primary customers are refiners and metal traders.

End Markets

Gold MarketSilver MarketPrecious Metals Investment

Revenue Drivers

Gold production volume
Silver production volume
Commodity prices
Market Cap: 589.2MBeta: 1.51

Why Is It Priced Like This?

Why Customers Pay

Supply of raw gold
Supply of raw silver
Diversification for refiners
No discounted-cash-flow value for this filer No machine-readable cash-flow statement in this filer's EDGAR submissions — common for foreign private issuers (20-F/6-K). That makes a discounted-cash-flow valuation impossible: there is no free cash flow to discount. It does not affect the income-statement or balance-sheet figures below.

The income statement and balance sheet are also too incomplete here to substitute another lens honestly, so this page carries price, momentum and disclosure facts only.

The market is pricing Osisko Development Corp. based on expectations of future production and the successful development of its mining assets, rather than current cash flow, which is negative. The 'FCF?Free Cash Flow (FCF) — Operating cash flow minus capital spending: cash left after a company covers operating costs, taxes and interest and reinvests in the business — but BEFORE repaying debt principal or paying dividends. The cash actually available to investors.
Why it matters: A company can show big profits on paper while burning through cash. FCF is what actually fills the bank account.
Reference: Healthy mature businesses convert 8–15% of revenue into FCF · Growth companies often negative
Full explanation →
negative' health signal indicates the company is in a growth phase requiring significant capital investment, and the market may be assigning value to the optionality of resource expansion and new project catalysts, which is not in the model.

Business Model & Valuation

How They Make Money

Gold production volume
Silver production volume
Commodity prices

Growth / Revenue DCF

No cash flow statement data available - using revenue/margin growth model as fallback.

Show advanced inputs
Revenue Growth15.0%

What this model does NOT do: this is a consolidated owner-earnings FCF model. Standalone segment assumptions: none. It does not project production volumes, realized commodity prices and unit cash costs independently; their combined effect is embedded in the historical revenue and cash-flow trend the model extrapolates. The calculator above can only approximate a segment's impact through the single consolidated growth rate — it cannot model any one line separately. For a true segment-level view, build a separate model from the company's segment disclosures.

Maturity & Competitive Position

Cyclical / commodity-linked producer

Moat Signals

Geological expertise in resource identification
Strategic land packages
Operational efficiency in mining

The company's track record is characterized by a focus on project development, with revenue trends tied to the progress of its mining assets.

Geography & Markets

Osisko Development Corp. primarily operates in North America, with key projects located in Canada and the United States. Specific geographic revenue percentages are not available from current data sources.

Geographic Risks

Concentration risk in North American mining jurisdictions
Regulatory and permitting risks in mining

Market Signals

These are timing signals, not value signals — they describe the stock's recent price behavior, not what the business is worth. Use them for the "the thesis looks good, but is now the moment?" question. Each tile below explains what it's saying.

Model neutral, tape bearish
RSI?RSI — Relative Strength Index — a 0-100 momentum gauge. Above 70 = overbought; below 30 = oversold.
Why it matters: Short-term contrarian indicator. Extreme readings often precede mean reversion, though not always.
Reference: 30–70 normal · >70 overbought · <30 oversold
Full explanation →
(14)
40.6NeutralMomentum is balanced — neither overbought nor oversold.
MACD?MACD — Moving Average Convergence Divergence — compares a fast and a slow price trend to gauge momentum direction.
Why it matters: When the fast line crosses above the slow line, short-term momentum is turning up; below, turning down. A timing cue, not a value signal.
Reference: Line above signal = bullish momentum · below = bearish
Full explanation →
BearishLine below signalThe fast trend is below the slow trend — short-term momentum is currently downward.
50-Day Average$3.14Price below (-26.4%)Price below its 50-day average = near-term downtrend.
200-Day Average$3.38Price belowThe 200-day line is the long-term trend divider — above it is generally considered a bull market for the stock.
50 vs 200 CrossDeath50-day below 200-dayA "death cross" — the medium trend is below the long trend (often read as bearish).

Technicals describe price, not the business. A great company can have a "bearish" tape (a buying chance) and a weak one a "bullish" tape (a trap). Pair these with the valuation and health sections above.

Data Quality & Risk Flags (4 notes — click to expand/collapse)

Guardrail Notes (4)
  • FCF negative: revenue/margin growth model projects future cash flows from revenue trajectory.
  • INVARIANT: weighted IV is non-positive. Model may not be appropriate.
  • Model implies no positive equity value under these assumptions. Valuation is speculative/low-confidence.
  • Illiquidity discount 7% applied (small/micro-cap — harder to exit, demand a margin).

Financial Statements (5-year tables — click to expand)

From Osisko Development Corp.'s SEC filings (EDGAR).

PG
Methodology by Pouyan Golshani, MD — founder of Gighz. Savng was built by a physician for busy professionals: every number on this page comes from SEC filings (EDGAR) and FINRA data through transparent, rules-based models — no analyst opinions, no hidden inputs. How we calculate every number →
⚠️ Not investment advice. Automated model outputs, last refreshed May 30, 2026 (the analysis-refresh date, not the latest filing period). All models have blind spots. Full disclaimer →
🔔 Follow $ODV — free insider alerts
One email when an insider buys $ODV on the open market with their own cash — or notably sells outside a scheduled plan. Routine and automated trades filtered out. Follow up to 3 stocks free; Portfolio Watch covers your whole list plus valuation & risk alerts. Double opt-in, unsubscribe anytime.